Page 273 - Operations Strategy
P. 273

248 CHAPTER 7 • ImPRovEmEnT sTRATEgy

                             Figure 7.6  the importance–performance matrix

                                                              F
                                    GOOD  1   EXCESS?

                                          2
                                          3                   APPROPRIATE                    B
                                       E
                                    Performance against  competitors  5  IMPROVE             D
                                          4


                                          6
                                       A
                                          7
                                          8                                     URGENT
                                                                                 ACTION
                                          9
                                    BAD     9    8     7     6     5    4     3     2     1
                                                            C
                                                         Importance for customers
                                         LOW                                            HIGH


                           approximate boundary between performance levels that were regarded as ‘good’ or
                           ‘appropriate’ on one hand and those regarded as ‘too good’ or ‘excess’ on the other.
                           Segregating the matrix in this way results in four zones that imply very different
                           priorities:

                           ●	 The ‘appropriate’ zone – This zone is bounded on its lower edge by the ‘lower bound
                              of acceptability’ – that is, the level of performance below which the company, in the
                              medium term, would not wish the operation to fall. Moving performance up to, or
                              above, this boundary is likely to be the first-stage objective for any improvement pro-
                              gramme. Competitive factors that fall in this area should be considered satisfactory,
                              at least in the short to medium term. In the long term, however, most organisations
                              will wish to edge performance towards the upper boundary of the zone.
                           ●	 The ‘improve’ zone – Any competitive factor that lies below the lower bound of the
                              ‘appropriate’ zone will be a candidate for improvement. Those lying either just below
                              the bound or in the bottom left-hand corner of the matrix (where performance is
                              poor but it matters less) are likely to be viewed as non-urgent cases. They certainly
                              need to improve, but probably not as a first priority.
                           ●	 The ‘urgent-action’ zone – More critical will be any competitive factor that lies in the
                              ‘urgent-action’ zone. These are aspects of operations performance where achieve-
                              ment is so far below what it ought to be, given its importance to the customer, that
                              business is probably being lost directly as a result. Short-term objectives must be,
                              therefore, to raise the performance of any competitive factors lying in this zone at
                              least up to the ‘improve’ zone. In the medium term they would need to be improved
                              beyond the lower bound of the ‘appropriate’ zone.












        M07 Operations Strategy 62492.indd   248                                                      02/03/2017   13:06
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278