Page 69 - SEO Mad Scientist 2020 Report
P. 69
could respond differently. That’s why creating a big test group and repeating tests is vital to
determine the validity of the findings.
Test Results: July 10, 2020
Our first test group came back with the below results, which held steady since indexing:
● Page #3 - No EXIF data (only one showing and not filtered)
● Page #1 - Keyword in all EXIF data of the image (filtered results)
● Page #5 - No EXIF data (filtered results)
● Page #2 - No EXIF data (filtered results)
● Page #4 - Not indexed
EXIF data didn’t take the #1 spot and didn’t seem to produce any more authority or relevance
over page #3. However, it's not enough to draw any concrete conclusions. We need to run more
tests to ensure the results can be repeated.
Does EXIF Data Help with GMB Local Search?
Test Setup:
We ran the same type of EXIF data tests with GMB, using a made-up keyword and EXIF data. The
data was uploaded directly to the GMB and used Local Viking to track.
69