Page 69 - SEO Mad Scientist 2020 Report
P. 69

could respond differently. That’s why creating a big test group and repeating tests is vital to
               determine the validity of the findings.


               Test Results: July 10, 2020

               Our first test group came back with the below results, which held steady since indexing:


                   ●   Page #3 - No EXIF data (only one showing and not filtered)
                   ●   Page #1 - Keyword in all EXIF data of the image (filtered results)
                   ●   Page #5 - No EXIF data (filtered results)
                   ●   Page #2 - No EXIF data (filtered results)
                   ●   Page #4 - Not indexed


               EXIF data didn’t take the #1 spot and didn’t seem to produce any more authority or relevance
               over page #3. However, it's not enough to draw any concrete conclusions. We need to run more
               tests to ensure the results can be repeated.





               Does EXIF Data Help with GMB Local Search?


               Test Setup:


               We ran the same type of EXIF data tests with GMB, using a made-up keyword and EXIF data. The
               data was uploaded directly to the GMB and used Local Viking to track.
































                                                                                                          69
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74