Page 652 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 652

c15riskandinformation.qxd  8/16/10  11:10 AM  Page 626







                  626                   CHAPTER 15   RISK AND INFORMATION

                  an individual may have both individual coverage and  have a preexisting condition. The preexisting condition
                  some form of government insurance as well.) 10  As has  is a signal of the individual’s intrinsic health risk. But
                  been noted in the text, employer-based health insur-  denial of coverage based on preexisting conditions is
                  ance coverage solves the adverse selection problem  unpopular and seen by some as fundamentally unfair,
                  by pooling risk across a large group of people, so that  since preexisting conditions may arise through no fault
                  the insurance rates paid by the company (or the work-  of the individual. Further, denial of coverage based on
                  ers) reflect the average health risk of the employees  preexisting conditions adds to the population of the
                  in the company, not the risk of the high-risk workers.  uninsured. And from an economic efficiency perspec-
                      However, the individual health insurance market  tive, a large uninsured population may be problematic.
                  is different. This market provides insurance for those  Uninsured parties may lack the access to the health
                  who cannot obtain health insurance from an employer  care system that would otherwise induce them to en-
                  or government health insurance plan. Unlike group  gage in preventive care (e.g., annual checkups) or seek
                  health plans in a company or government-provided   care when a medical condition is treatable. Without
                  insurance, healthier individuals who might otherwise  health insurance, individuals may wait until the prob-
                  purchase health insurance in the individual market  lem is so severe that high-cost emergency care is the
                  may instead decide to go without insurance. The result  only option. Distortions in medical decisions stemming
                  of this behavior can lead to an adverse selection “death  from lack of health insurance may raise the overall cost
                  spiral” that operates something like this: Insurance  of medical care in the United States.
                  companies set prices based on the average health risk of  A key goal of Obamacare is to reduce the number
                  the anticipated purchasers of insurance, but at these  of uninsured, while at the same time eliminating denial
                  prices, relatively healthy individuals choose to go with-  of coverage based on preexisting conditions (or in the
                  out coverage, and the riskiness of the pool of insured is  parlance of insurance, providing “guaranteed issue” of
                  worse than anticipated. This, in turn, induces insurance  insurance). By itself, adopting guaranteed issue could
                  companies to increase premiums to cover their now  actually worsen the adverse selection problem.
                  higher-than-expected insurance expenses. But if insur-  Knowing that you cannot be turned away for health
                  ance premiums are increased, even more individuals  insurance, you might wait until you need health care to
                  will opt out of the market, leaving an even higher risk  purchase insurance. Thus, to prevent the system from
                  pool. If insurance companies are still unable to cover  being “gamed” in this way (which is really an extreme
                  their expenses, they may raise rates even more, leading  form of adverse selection) and to deal with adverse
                  to more individuals opting out of the insurance market,  selection and the thinness of the individual health insur-
                  and an even higher risk pool still. The end result might  ance market more generally, the PPACA mandates that
                  be a very thin market with very high premiums that  all individuals must have health insurance (the so-called
                  only the highest risk individuals are willing to pay.  individual mandate). For those who do not have health
                  Broadly, this describes the individual health insurance  insurance through an employer or do not qualify for
                  market in the United States. The significant number of  government insurance programs such as Medicaid, indi-
                  individuals who go without health insurance is, in part,  viduals will have the ability to purchase health insur-
                  a reflection of adverse selection in the health insurance  ance policies on state (or multistate) exchanges, which
                  market.                                          are intended to create competitive markets that include
                      In practice, insurance companies do take steps to  a broad pool of individuals with diversified health risks.
                  sell insurance policies based on differences in individ-  But an individual mandate creates another problem: It
                  uals’ health risks. And setting prices based on different  forces individuals to purchase insurance who do not
                  risk profiles is a possible antidote to adverse selection  want it (i.e., their maximum willingness to pay for insur-
                  death spirals and may help health insurance markets  ance is less than the premium) or who cannot afford it.
                  operate more efficiently. This is why, for example, in-  To deal with this issue, the PPACA provides means-
                  dividuals may not be able to obtain health insurance  tested subsidies to individuals who purchase insurance
                  coverage in the individual insurance market if they  in the exchanges.


                                        10 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008,
                                        September 2009, http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-236.pdf (accessed April 30, 2010).
   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657