Page 657 - Microeconomics, Fourth Edition
P. 657

c15riskandinformation.qxd  8/16/10  11:10 AM  Page 631







                                                              15.4 ANALYZING RISKY DECISIONS                    631


                                 Build large
                                 facility      Oil company's expected payoff (millions)
                                 (no test)
                                               0.5($50) + 0.5($10) = $30

                                 Build small
                                 facility
                                 (no test)                                     FIGURE 15.13    Folded Back Decision
                          A                    0.5($30) + 0.5($20) = $25       Tree for Oil Company’s Facility Size Decision
                                                                               with an Option to Test
                                                                               Compare this figure to Figure 15.12. The folded
                                                                               back decision tree makes it clear that the oil
                                 Conduct seismic                               company’s best plan of action is to conduct the
                                 test first
                                               0.5($50) + 0.5($20) = $35       seismic test and then decide whether to build a
                                                                               small facility or a large one.



                      payoff for building a small facility without testing). Thus, the firm’s optimal plan of
                      action can be summarized as follows:


                       • Conduct the seismic test.
                       • If the test says the reservoir is large, build a large facility.
                       • If the test says the reservoir is small, build a small facility.

                         This example illustrates the basic steps involved in constructing and analyzing a
                      decision tree.

                      1. Begin by mapping out the sequence of decisions and risky events.
                      2. For each decision, identify the alternative choices the decision maker can make.
                      3. For each risky event, identify the possible outcomes.
                      4. Assign probabilities to the risky events.
                      5. Identify payoffs for all possible combinations of decision alternatives and risky
                         outcomes.
                      6. Finally, find the optimal sequence of decisions by folding back the tree. In so
                         doing, you identify the expected value of the lotteries at each chance node and
                         determine the highest expected payoff option at each decision node. The payoff
                         corresponding to that highest expected payoff option then becomes the value you
                         assign to that decision node.

                      THE VALUE OF INFORMATION

                      When faced with risky decisions, decision makers benefit from information that helps
                      them reduce or even eliminate the risk. The value of information is reflected in the
                      fact that oil companies spend money to perform seismic tests before drilling oil wells,
                      that consumer products companies spend money to test market new products before
                      they roll them out on a national scale, and that prospective presidential candidates
                      spend money taking polls and establishing exploratory committees before throwing
                      their hats into the ring. The decision tree analysis that we just went through can help
                      us identify the economic value of information.
   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662