Page 207 - Services Selection Board (SSB) Interviews
P. 207

Statement and Arguments                                                                             203
            17.   (e) Clearly, it is the advertisement which makes the   22.   (a) Clearly,  every  person  must  be  free to  work
                customer aware of the qualities of the product and    wherever he  wants and  no compulsion  should  be
                leads him to buy it. So, argument I is valid. But at   made to confine one to one’s own country. So,
                the same time, advertising nowadays has become a      argument I  is vague. However,  talented scientists
                cost affair and expenses on it add to the price of the   can be  of great  benefit to  the nation and some
                product. So, argument II also holds strong.           alternatives as special incentives or better prospects
            18.   (a) Clearly, laws are made to ensure that no person   may be made available to them to retain them within
                pursues  the  practice.  So, persons  who violate  the   their motherland. So, argument II also does not hold.
                laws need to be punished. Thus, argument I holds. A
                wrong practice, no matter how firmly rooted, needs   23.   (e) Both the argument are strong enough.  The
                to be ended. So, argument II is vague.                condition have to be agreed to, in order to save the
            19.   (d) Clearly, such projects if handed over to the private   life of the victims, though actually they ought not to
                sector shall be given to a competent authority. So,   be agreed to, as they encourage the sinister activities
                argument  I is vague.  Also, imitating  a policy  on   of the kidnappers.
                the basis  that it worked out successfully in other   24.   (b) For the all –round progress  of the nation, all
                countries, holds no relevance. Thus, argument II also   the students, especially the talented and intelligent
                does not hold strong.                                 ones, must avail  of higher  education,  even if the
            20.   (e)  Clearly, a good  behavior  may  at some point   government has to pay for it, So, only argument II
                of time  lead  to mutual  discussions and  peaceful   holds.
                settlement of issues in the long run. So, argument
                I  holds strong.  However,  such a behavior may be   25.   (a) clearly, 15 year  old  vehicles  are not Euro-
                mistaken for our weakness and it would be difficult   compliant  and hence  cause much more pollution
                to continue with it if the other country doesn’t stop   than the recent ones. So, argument I holds. Argument
                its sinister activities. Hence, II also holds.        II is vague since owners of these vehicles need not
            21.   (a) Clearly, independent judiciary is necessary for   shift themselves. They  might  sell  off their  vehicles
                impartial judgement so that the Executive does not    and buy new ones – a small price which every citizen
                take wrong measures. So, only argument I hold.        can afford for a healthy environment.


                                                    Concept Builder

            1.   (d) As I is weak because it is Superfluous, it dose not   7.   (e) I is strong because it is desirable to help the needy
                go into the reason for population control. II. Is an   students. II is also strong because compromising on
                argument by example and hence weak.                   quality takes away from the purpose of education.
            2.   (a) I is strong because female foeticide is undesirable.   8.   (b) I is weak because it gives undue weightage to
                II is weak.                                           nuclear power.  Hydel power etc  also help reduce
            3.   (e) I  is  true on Humaterian  Ground and II  on     air pollution.  II  is strong because safety is  a very
                economic ground.                                      important criterion.
            4.   (b) I is weak because it is not relevant to “complete   9.   (d) I is weak because it lacks in substance. Merely
                ban”, II is a strong argument because banning mining   calling something a "nuisance” is simplistic. II  is
                in such a scenario will lead us into great trouble.   weak because it wrongly assumes that those people
            5.   (e) I is strong as improved  ambience  is desirable.   can’t contribute to the nation otherwise.
                II  is strong because regimentation  of adults is   10.   (a) I is strong because performance should definitely
                undesirable.                                          be a criterion for “national sport” status. II is irrelevant
            6.   (a) I is strong as growth of the economy is desirable.   one fails to see the harm in two nations sharing a
                II is not strong because Saturdays and Sundays are    national sport. Besides, if every nation decided to
                meant for this very intermitten rest”. This purpose is   have a different national sport, we would run out of
                not served by holidays.                               sports as there would be just too many countries.
   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212