Page 209 - Services Selection Board (SSB) Interviews

Statement and Arguments 205
4. (a) The reservation of jobs in the private sector neither I nor II holds strong. Besides, the needs of a
too would surely increase opportunities for weaker job are laid down in the desired qualifications for the
sections improve their economic plight. Thus, job. So, recruitment of more qualified people cannot
argument I is strong enough. Also, private sector augment productivity. Thus, IV also does not hold
companies work on a good profit margin and they strong. However, it is the right of an individual to
can and will have to accommodate such a policy get the post for which he fulfils the eligibility criteria,
if implemented. So, neither II nor IV holds strong. whatever be his extra merits. Hence, augment III
Further, just imitating other countries holds no holds strong.
relevance. So, argument III also does not hold. 7. (c) Clearly, a person committing a heinous crime
5. (c) Young children of class IV ought to be taught the like murder or rape should be so punished as to
basic fundamentals of subjects in a gradual process set an example for other not to attempt such acts in
via practical examples and practice in a playful future. So, argument III holds strong. Argument I is
manner. They need not be made to study through vague while the use of the word ‘only’ in argument
compulsion and their age is not such as to bear the II makes it weak. Also, it cannot be assured whether
tension and burden of examinations. So, both II and a criminal is really repentant of his acts or not, he
IV hold strong. However, facing examinations at this may also exhibit so just to get rid of punishment. So,
stage shall prepare them to tackle the competitions argument IV also doe snot hold.
in later life. So, III also holds. However, holding 8. (c) Clearly, the rule has been devised for the safety
examinations cannot motivate such young and of two-wheeler riders, as majority of two-wheeler
immature students, neither is it a way to make them accidents result in direct fall of the rider, leading to
learn more. So, I does not holds strong. head injury and finally death. And the objective of a
6. (d) The issue discussed in the statement is nowhere rule cannot be fulfilled until it is followed by all and
this required strict enforcement. Thus, both I and IV
related to increase in unemployment, as the number hold strong, while III does not. Besides, it is the basic
of vacancies filled in will remain the same. Also, in a duty of the Government to look after the safety of
working place, it is the performance of the individual the citizens and it ought not leave it to the discretion
that matters and that makes him more or less of the individuals. So, argument II does not hold
wanted, and not his educational qualifications. So, strong.