Page 4 - DIVA_1_2009
P. 4

a             Editorial



                                              Greed...

                   "There   is  something   I  do  not   understand,"   a  friend   said   to  me  the  other   day.  "All   these
                   financial   losses,   banks   going   banlmipt...    The   money   lost   must   have   gone   somewhere?   It
                   cannot   simply   have   disappeared   into   thin   air!"

                   At   the  time   of  w't'ng,    our   civilized    world   seems   to  be  heading   towards   one  of  the  biggest   financial   crises   in  its  history,   and
                   nobody   knows   yet   what   the  consequences   will   be  in  terms   of  unemployment,    inflation,    lost   savings   ...

                   When   you   examine   the   very   broad   picture   of  why   it  happened,   it  all  boils   down   to  one   single   word:   "greed"   -  the  third   of  the
                    seven   deadly   sins-to    wbich   one  can  add  "more   greed",   expressed   through   speculation    and  lack   of   appropriate   rules   and
                   regulations-as    a  colleague   explained   to  me.

                    In   the  filn'i   Wan   Sh'eet   (1987),   Gordon   Gekko   (played   by   Michael   Douglas),   addresses   a  meeting   of   stockholders    w'th   the
                    follow'ng    words:   "The   point   is,  ladies   and   gentleman,   that   greed-for    lack   of  a  better   word-is    good.   Greed   is  right,   greed
                    works.   Greed   clarifies,   cuts   tbrough,   and   captiires   the  essence   of  the   evolutionary    spirit.   Greed,   in  all  of  its  forins;   greed   for   life,
                    for   money,   for   love,   for   lmowledge,    has  marked   the   ripward   surge   of  mankind."

                    Greed   is  common   huinan  behaviour:   the   more   you   get,  the  more   you  want.   But   is  it  really  "good"?   In   my   own   countty,   there   is
                    an  on-going   conflict   between   a  fomer   Nobel   Prize   Laureate   and  a  telecom   company.   In   the  1990s,   the  person   in  question
                    needed  funding  to  setup   atelecomcompany   offeiing   "cheap   telephone  calls   forthepoor".    He  found  a companythatwas    willing
                    to  come   up   with   the  fiinding.   The   two   parties   thus   started   a joint  project,   and  the  deal   was   that   the  organization   would   possess
                    35%   and   the   remaining    65%   would   be  in   Norwegian    hands.   Everything    went   well   until   the   person   who   had   had   the  idea   was
                    awarded   the   Nobel   Peace   Prize.

                    The   first  thing   the   Nobel   Laiu'eate   did   was   to  start   a  lobbying    campaign   in  order   to  obtain   complete   ownership    of  the  (jointly
                    owned)   company.   He   even   asked   the  Noiwegian    Governtnent    to  buy   the  shares   for   him   and   to  give   them   to  his  organization    -
                    -  sometg    they   refused   at  once  How   could   the  govemment    justify   buying   the  shares  of   a  private   company   with   the
                    taxpayer's   money...    and  then  giving  them   away?   Besides,   the  NorwegianNobel    Committee    is  a private   foundation   that   awards
                    its  prize   each   year,   and   is  quite   independent    of  the  Norwegian    State.  However,   the   Nobel   Laureate   did   not   give   up  and   he  still
                    wants   these   shares.   Lately,   he  changed   is   tactics   and   accused   the   Norwegian    telephone   company   of  using   child   labour.   Does
                    greed   have   any   restraint?   One   can  only   wonder.

                    "'n'iis   crisis   is  a  once-in-a-lifetime    experience,"    an  econotnics    professor  told   the   press   recently.   Although    it  might   happen   once
                    in  a  lifetime,   he  did   not   explain   why   it  was  happening   now   and  why   innocent   persons   should   be  paying   for   the  wishtul
                    thinking    of  those   who   are  to  blame.

                    Each   time   disaster   st'kes,   it's  the  ordinary   people   who   end  up  pay'ng   the  price.   They   are  the  ones  who   are  facing   higher
                    interest   rates,   higher   taxation   and   losing   their  jobs...

                    "Those   who   cannot   remember   the  past,  are  condemned   to  repeat   it,"  are  the  fainous   words   by  the  Spanish/American
                    philosopher,    essayist,   poet,   and  novelist   George   Santayana.   When  you   ignore   istory,    you  pay   the   price...
                    So  one  can   only   ask  why  nobody   sounded  the  alami  before   it  was   too   late  or,  if  it  was   sounded,   why   wasn't   it  listened  to?  I  am
                    stire   that   one  day   all  will   be  revealed.   Let   us  hope   that   we   do  not   have   to  go  through   an  ordeal   like   the  Second   World   War
                    before   we   find   the  answer.

                    Mazit.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9