Page 321 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 321

'.W6        SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  THE  ARCTIC  HOME
          .and show  that he has  dealt with this·important passage in an off-
          -hand  manner.  It is  well-known  that the  Taittirtya  Samhita  often
           explains  the  Mantras,  and  this  portion  of the  Samhita  is  called
           Brahma~a, the whole of the Taittirtya  Samhita  being made up in
           this  way  of Mantras  and the  Brahma~a, or  prayers  and  their
          -explanations-or ·commentary mixed  up together.  The  statement
          .regarding :the apprehensions of the priests aboutthe coming dawn,
           tlierefore,  falls  under  the -Brahma~a  portion  of  the  Samhita.
           Now · the  contents- of the  Brahma~as are  usually  classified  by,
           Indian divines under the ten following heads* ( 1 ) Hetu or reason;
          ·( 2)  Nirvachana,  or  etymological  explanation;  ( 3 )  Ninda  or
           censure;  ( 4)  Prashainsa,  or  praise;  ( 5)  Sainshaya,  or  doubt;
           ( 6 )  Vidhi,  or  the  rule;  ( 7 )  Parakriyd, 'or others'  doings; ( & )
           Pur.a·kalpa,  or  ancient  rite  or  tradition;  ( 9 )  VyavadhdratJa·
           kalpana  or determining  the limitations;  (  10)  Upamdna,  an  apt
          -comparison  or simile.  saya~a in  his  introduction  to  the  comm-
           entary  on  the  ~ig-Veda mentions  the first  nine  of these,  and  as
          ·an  illustration. of the  eighth,  Purakalpa,  quotes  the  explanatory
          .passage from the Taittirtya Samhita,  I,  5,  7,  5,  referred  to above.
           According to  Saya~a the  statement,  "  In former times  the priests
           were  afraid  that  it  would  not  dawn",  therefore,  comes  under
           Pura-kalpa,  or ancient traditional history found in the Brahma~as.
           It is  no  Arthavdda,  that is,  speculation or explanation  put  forth
          . by  the Brahma~a itself.  This is evident from the word pura which
           occurs in the  Samhita  text,  and which  shows  that some  piece  of
           ancient traditional information is  here recorded.  Now if this view
          ·is  correct,  a  question  naturally  arises  why  should  ordinary  long
           winter  nights have  caused  such  apprehensions  in  the  minds  of
           the priests only ' in former times ', and why should the long dark-
           ness  cease  to inspire  the  same  fears  in the  minds  of the  present
           generation.  The  long  winter  nights  in the  tropical  and  the  tem-
           perate zone  are  as  long to-day  as  they  were  thousands  of  years
          ago,  and  yet  none  of us,  not  even  the  most ignorant,  feels  any
           misgiving  about  the  dawn  which  puts  an  end  to  the  darkness
           of these  long  nights.  It  may,  perhaps,  be  urged  that  in  ancient
           times  the  bards  had  not  acquired  the  knowledge  necessary  to

              • -These a_re.  enumerated in the follow~ng verses  -
              {ID~ f:r<U ~ ~~: I  '1~ ~~~ «i<ftli(•l'fiNill II
              ~ ~~ ~--~ ~.) ~ tl~ fit<Jef ~II
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326