Page 22 - 40thAnniversaryNJPSA
P. 22

During the McGreevey/Codey years (2002-2006), attention
                 3. Property Taxes and The Special                   turned to rising property tax issues, as the impact of the
                     Legislative Session - 2006                      Whitman tax cuts grew. On June 6, 2006, with newly-elected
                                                                     Governor Jon Corzine in office, Senate President Dick
          Over time, our state leaders changed both in the Executive   Codey and Assembly Speaker Joe Roberts announced “an
          and Legislative branches, as did our state’s economic fortunes.   unprecedented special legislative session” to grapple with New
          With each cycle, the public’s perspectives and our politicians’   Jersey’s highest in the nation property taxes. At the close of
          priorities shifted.                                        that month, the first government shut-down occurred when
                                                                     Governor Corzine and the State Legislature could not agree on
          In the Christine Todd Whitman years (1994-2001), the       a State Budget that contained a one percent sales tax increase
          focus was on tax relief including income tax reductions, that   by the July 1 statutory deadline. The proposed sales tax was
          Republican majorities in the State Legislature enacted. The   a thorn in the side of the Legislature seeking to cut costs
          subsequent state revenue deficits impacted state coffers and   instead. Ultimately dedicating half of the sales tax revenue
          its ability to meet state obligations, including its obligation   to property tax relief and half to state expenditures, the shut-
          to fully fund the schools. Whitman’s husband, a Wall Street   down ended. However, the fervor for property tax relief efforts
          entrepreneur, developed a plan to borrow against the then   only intensified.
          well-funded assets of the public pension systems. This $2.8
          billion pension bond legislation passed the Legislature despite   On July 28, 2006, via legislative resolution, four specific joint
          the concerns raised by NJPSA and other members of the      legislative committees were established to grapple with the
          public pension systems. To offset these concerns, a major   underlying components of the property tax issue: public school
          benefit was enacted for public pension members, the changing   funding reform, government consolidation and shared services,
          of the pension formula itself to the number of years of service   public employee benefits reform, and constitutional reform
          over age 55. Naturally, NJPSA supported this member pension   with a potential for a Citizens’ Property Tax Constitutional
          enhancement, but its availability to members was relatively   Convention. These committees had four months to meet,
          short-lived as future pension reforms would eliminate it for   study a complex state issue, take testimony from witnesses
          future generations of public employees.                    statewide, and develop recommendations for legislative
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27