Page 15 - GS_Journal_2015

Urdaneta City University

used in this study are non-indicators of differences in their MAPEH program management
performance. 4). In like manner, the profile variables, as aforecited, are non-indicators of
relationships or association, therefore have nothing to do with the MAPEH program management
performance of the respondent-school administrators. 5). The respondent-school administrators
are beset by certain MAPEH education related problems that need to be addressed to enable
them become more exemplary school managers of the MAPEH program.
On the basis of the findings and conclusions, this study sets forth the following
recommendations: 1). The respondent-school administrators should attend more in-service
trainings, both in the national and international levels to further update themselves on MAPEH
program management through sponsorships, fellowships, study grants, and/or aids. 2). The
respondent-school administrators should continue soaring high to sustain their exemplary very
high performance in their MAPEH program management. 3). Other variables may be explored in
determining variability of the MAPEH program management performance of school administrators
4). Similarly, other variables too may be explored in determining what can be associated with
the MAPEH program management performance of the school administrators 5). Finally, other
related research studies may be conducted to provide new perspectives and/or dimensions in
the MAPEH program management.

LEVELS OF COMPETENCE OF COMMUNITY-BASED HEALTH WORKERS
JASMIN BALOCA-RODRIGO

This study determined the levels of learning difficulty of 80 fourth year high school
students in Physics. These students were randomly selected from the Rosales National High
School, Pangasinan Division II, during the SY 2014- 2015. Specifically, problem No. 1 dealt
with the profile variables, namely: a) sex, b) GPA in the second grading period, c) monthly
family income, d) highest educational attainment of fathers, e) highest educational attainment
of mothers, f) occupation of parents, g) learning practices (note taking, doing assignment,
participation during class discussion, h) teachers’ influence (personality, teaching methodology,
evaluation/feedback), i)school learning facilities (classroom, laboratory, library. Problem No. 2
determined the levels of test performance of the respondent-students in Science IV (Physics).
Problem No. 3 determined the levels of learning difficulty of the respondents in the different
cognitive areas, namely: knowledge, comprehension, application, evaluation, analysis, and
synthesis. Problem No. 4 determined whether or not there significant differences in the levels of
difficulty of the respondents in Science IV (Physics). Finally, Problem No. 5 determined
whether or not there are significant relationships between the levels of learning difficulty of the
respondents in Science IV (Physics).
The findings indicate there are more male than females among the respondent-
students, majority had GPA with the 75-79 brackets, belong to families whose monthly family

3