Page 89 - ASBIRES-2017_Preceedings

FACTORS AFFECTING JOB SATISFACTION OF SEWING MACHINE OPERATORS IN ORIT APPARELS
LANKA (PVT) LTD

5.4 Significance of the Coefficient

Table 3: Significance of the coefficient

Model Unstandardized Standardizd t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Err. Beta Tolerance VIF

1 (Constant) .926 .232 3.993 .000

Mana. Support .620 .065 .658 9.499 .000 1.000 1.000

2 (Constant) .547 .221 2.475 .015
Mana.Support .493 .064 .523 7.739 .000 .856 1.168

Salary .316 .060 .357 5.292 .000 .856 1.168

3 (Constant) -.349 .370 -.943 .348

Mana.Support .455 .063 .483 7.238 .000 .822 1.216

Salary .290 .058 .328 4.965 .000 .838 1.194

In.& Ori. Program .270 .091 .188 2.965 .004 .907 1.102

4 (Constant) -.294 .366 -.801 .425

Mana.Support .388 .070 .412 5.550 .000 .646 1.547

Salary .246 .061 .279 4.010 .000 .738 1.355

In.& Ori. Program .222 .093 .155 2.395 .018 .851 1.175

T.M. of Supervisor .148 .072 .169 2.073 .040 .533 1.875

th
Acording to 4 model of the Table 3, Induction Program:

Constant term: H0: β3 = 0 H1: β3 ≠ 0
H0: β0 = 0 H1: β0 ≠ 0 Since P value = 0.018 < 0.05, we have to
enough evidence to rejected H0 at 5% level
Since P value = 0.425 > 0.05, there is no of significance.
enough evidence to reject H0 at 5% level of
significance. Therefore the constant term Treated Manner of Supervisor:
(β0) is not significant. H0: β4 = 0 H1: β4 ≠ 0
Managerial Support: Since P value = 0.040 < 0.05, we have to

H0: β1 = 0 H1: β1 ≠ 0 enough evidence to rejected H0 at 5% level
of significance.
Since P value = 0.000 < 0.05, we have
enough evidence to rejected H0 at 5% level Multicollinearity
th
of significance. According to the Table 3, in the 4
model all VIF<5, therefore multicollinearity
Salary:
does not exist.
H0: β2 = 0 H1: β2≠ 0
Job Satisfaction=0.222* Induction program+
Since P value = 0.000 < 0.05, we have 0.246* Salary +0.148* Treated manner of
enough evidence to rejected H0 at 5% level Supervisor + 0.388* Managerial Support
of significance (2)

79