Page 18 - IAGC The Voice 2017
P. 18

IAGC SUPPORTS SEA ACT


            LEGISLATION TO OVERHAUL


            THE MMPA




               AGC momentum for greater     overfishing and overhunting.
               offshore access continues
           Iwith      U.S.  Congressman     Today,   amid    stable  and
            Mike    Johnson's    (LA-04)    increasing marine mammal
            introduction of the SEA Act     populations, the SEA Act will
            of 2017. Introduced on 27       provide a balanced  approach
            June,  the  SEA  Act  offers a   to ensure that critical activities
            common-sense approach to        and projects such as coastal
            correct flawed MMPA of the      restoration, offshore energy and
            1970s.  The SEA Act addresses   mineral exploration, and military
            many of the inadequacies and    operations can move forward.
            misapplications of the MMPA
            to industries and projects for   The     IAGC        supports
            which it was never designed     Congressman Johnson's efforts
            to regulate. The MMPA was       and appreciates his leadership
            enacted to address significant   on this crucial issue that has
            declines in some species of     hampered exploration in the
            marine  mammals caused by       U.S. OCS.
                                                                                 U.S. Congressman Mike Johnson (LA-04)








            IAGC SUCCESSFULLY PROTECTS INDUSTRY'S


            RIGHT TO DEFEND PERMITTED ACTIVITY




                     ith the IAGC's amicus  or seeking new relief, then it must  the case). A defendant-intervenor
                     brief in Chester v. Laroe,  demonstrate standing.           would only have to demonstrate
           Wthe U.S. Supreme Court                                               standing if it were filing a cross-
            declined to require standing  In its amicus brief, the IAGC  claim or counterclaim.  This
            for  a  defendant-intervenor.  The  urged  the   Court   to   avoid  decision ensures  that  industry
            Supreme Court's 5 June 2017       establishing a new rule requiring  organizations will continue to
            decision narrowly focused on the  defendant-intervenors,     which   have the opportunity to defend
            specific facts before the Court   industry stakeholders  often  are,  in court positive agency actions,
            regarding a plaintiff-intervenor's  to demonstrate standing (i.e.,  such as decisions to permit seismic
            need to establish standing and  sufficient connection to and harm  surveys,     that  are   challenged
            unsurprisingly concludes that if  from the law or action challenged to   by  environmental   advocacy
            an intervenor is raising new claims  support that party's participation in   organizations.





        18                                                                                            THE VOICE
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23