Page 19 - Stanochny park
P. 19

METALWORKING EQUIPMENT                                                             METALWORKING EQUIPMENT
 AND TOOLS                                                                          AND TOOLS
    The  contribution  of  the  rotation  of  the  mandrel  relative  to  the  spindle in  its  radial
 displacements can be estimated by the expression:                       the  massive  cylindrical part  of  the
                                                                                mandrel  and  the  spindle,  in
                                                                                    the  region  of  the  control
                                                                                    platform 1, which restrained
                                                                                    the  volumetric deformation
                                                                                  of  the  spindle,  the  radial

    A quantitative analysis carried out using this dependence showed the insignificance of this   movements of the control platform
 contribution for all considered joint sizes and load application options.  2 of the spindle sharply increase. In
 A detailed description and analysis of the nature of deformations and physical processes in the   turn, the increase in the movement
 considered tool joints occurring as a result of the action of the set of external loads specified   of the control platform 1, caused by
 above is given on the example of the HSK-A63 joint.                         the increase in radial load, slows
                                                                                down.  The  massive  cylindrical
                                                                                part  of  the  mandrel  carries
                                                                                with  it the  spindle material
                        a                                   b                 interacting  with it.  The  cross
    Fig. 4. Pressure distribution on the                     section of the spindle in the region of the flat
    contacting surfaces of the mandrel and                   end  assumes  an  oval shape,  as  well  as  the
    spindle at various values of radial force:
    a) - 0 kN (clamp); b) - 5 kN.                            cross section of the spindle, and in the region of
                                                             control sites 3 and 4 at loads exceeding 4 kN.
            The deformation of the conical part of the mandrel contributes to the offset of the mandrel
    relative to the spindle. Figure 5, b illustrates the radial movements of the control pads 3 and 4
    of the mandrel. In the initial section, up to about 3 kN, the curves are parallel, i.e. the shank
    is practically not deformed under the action of radial load. With increasing radial deformations
    (ovality) of the spindle, the deformations of the shank caused by the clamping force of the
    mandrel decrease, and the curves diverge. Subsequently, the partial opening of the conical joint
    due to deformations of the shank and spindle leads to the inclination of the mandrel, which
    corresponds to a change in the direction of movements of platforms 3 and 4 in Fig. 5, b.
            As the flat unfolds, the load on the conical joint increases, which partially opens (see the
    movement of the sites 4 in Fig. 5, b) when exceeded 5 kN radial force.
 a  b       The nature of the curves in Fig. 5 allows us to conclude that for radial forces exceeding
    Fкр, the relative radial displacement of the mandrel and spindle does not occur in the form of
    ‘‘stall‘‘, as stated in [1], but is the result of complex spatial deformations of the mandrel and
 Fig. 3. Critical loads (1, 3 and 5 - Fкр (x), Fкр (y) and Fcr (θ); 2, 4 and
    Plots of  contact pressure   6 corresponding approximating curves for the joint HSK-A63 - fig. а) and   spindle, which cannot be taken into account using analytical models. Based on the calculation
 on mating surfaces for a shoulder   HSK-A100 - fig. b)  results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
 L  =  94.5  mm  with  a  radial   pads, preceding the contact of flat surfaces, occurs due to      ●  when  using  the  HSK  joint,  it
 load  of  F  =  0  and  4500  N  are   deformation of the structure when pulling the mandrel cone   retains its operational properties for all
 shown in Fig. 4. The information   into the spindle. During the final tightening, multidirectional   considered variants of radial loads not
 presented  in  the  figure  allows   deformations are partially compensated by the friction of flat   exceeding a certain critical value. Joint
 you to see a qualitative picture   surfaces; tangential stresses are observed at reference sites   deformations  in this load range  are
 of the pressure redistribution on   1 and 2.  commensurate with calculation errors.
 the  contacting  surfaces  of  the      The application of radial load changes the distribution   In  carrying  out  practical  calculations,
 mandrel  when the  radial load   of contact pressure at the joints. A drop in contact pressure   the  compliance  of  the  joints can  be
 changes.  and a decrease in the limiting value of the friction force (rest   neglected;
    From the figures it follows   friction) are observed in the upper part of the flat ring joint,      ● when the load increases above
 that  after  the  application of   and the reverse process is observed in the lower part. As F   a  certain  critical value,  axial,  radial
 the  clamping force  at the  end   increases, slippage occurs in those sections of the junction   and  angular  displacements  of  the
 and  the  cone  of  the mandrel,   where the value of rest friction is exceeded.  mandrel  appear  due to the  pulling   a  b
 contact areas arise (see Fig. 4,      With  a  further  increase  in  radial  force,  the  flat  ring   of  the mandrel and  spindle and  their   Fig. 5. Radial movement of control sites: a) - at the end and cone
 a),  forming  respectively  a  flat   joint opens. The friction force acting between the contacting   volumetric  deformations.  With  a  spindle; b) - on the cone of the spindle and mandrel.
 annular surface and two distinct   surfaces of the spindle and the mandrel disappears in the   further increase in load, the compound
 annular belts [3]. Measurement   areas  that  have  come  out  of  contact.  An  even  greater   loses its operational properties. Failure,
 of radial displacements in a flat   increase in the radial load leads to the opening of the conical   which is necessarily preceded by the disclosure of a flat joint, is accompanied by a sharp increase
 annular  joint shows that  they   joint — the  contact  pressure  in the  region  of  the  annular   in the compliance of the mandrel-spindle joint in the axial and radial directions;
 have positive and negative   zones disappears, and at the same time the contact on the      ● in none of the load application variants, there was no complete slippage between the
 directions  for  the  spindle  greater part of the flat ring joint disappears (see Fig. 4, b).  mandrel and the spindle on the entire surface of the flat ring joint. Slip on a part of the surface
 and  mandrel,  respectively.     As can be seen from the graphs presented in Figure   of the annular joint does not significantly affect the operational properties of the joint;
 The  movement  of  the  control      ● the distance from the end face of the spindle to the point of application of the radial
 5, a, after the disappearance of the friction force between   load (L), along with the dimensions of the joint, is the most important parameter characterizing

 18  Stanochniy park                                                                            Stanochniy park       19
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24