Page 12 - Corporate_Professional_Today
P. 12

TAxAbiliTy of reimburSemenT of buSineSS exPenSeS under  inCome-TAx ACT


           element, it could not be regarded as income     PE in India?  For example: reimbursement of
           chargeable to tax in hands of Abbey UK.         expenditure incurred towards air fare, lodging,
           Abbey  Business  Services (India) (P.)  Ltd.  v.   food, etc., incurred by personnel of NRE during
           Dy. CIT [2012] 23 taxmann.com 346 (Bang.)       their  visits  to  India,  will  be  business  income
           Similar view was taken in another case,  Dy.    and not royalty, but will not be taxable as
           DIT v.  Tekmark Global Solutions LLC [2010]     NRE did not have any PE in India.  Jt. DIT
           38 SOT 7 (MUM.)                                 (OSD) v.  Harvard Medical International, USA
                                                           [2011] 16 taxmann.com 69 (Mum.)
           For taxing income in the hands of NRE, the
           reimbursement of salary of the seconded         Similarly, amount paid to its non-resident
           employees, it is necessary to establish an      associate enterprise towards bank guarantee
           employer-employee relationship between the      commission, social insurance for expatriates
           Indian company and the seconded employees.      who worked for execution of the contract and
           Target Corpn. India (P.) Ltd., In re [2012] 24   software charges was towards reimbursement
           taxmann.com 152/209 Taxman 601 (AAR)            of  actual  expenses.  It  was  held,  following
                                                           the decision in  Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v.
           Where in the DTAA, it is provided that both
           the parties will benefit from the services      Dy. CIT [2009] 30 SOT 374/[2010] 122 ITD
           rendered by the seconded employees then         216 (Mum.) (SB) that it is not chargeable to
           reimbursement of the cost of the salary not     income-tax in the hands of payee,  Nathpa
           carrying any income element will not be         Jhakri Joint Venture  v.  Asstt. CIT [2010] 37
           taxable in India in terms of Section 9(1)(vii),   SOT 160 (MUM.)
           read with Article 13.4 of the India-Korea
           DTAA.  Cholamandalam MS General Insurance       Whether TDS is required on
           Co. Ltd., In re [2009] 178 Taxman 100 (AAR)     reimbursement of expenses?

           In any case, it is necessary to ascertain exact   4. For determining whether TDS is required
           nature of expenses incurred  by NRE and         to be made u/s 195 on reimbursement of
           services  rendered  for  which  reimbursement   expenses it is necessary to find out whether
           was made by Indian concern for the visit of     the reimbursement is chargeable to tax in
           employees of NRE to the Indian company.         India in the hands of NRE? A sum can
           WNS Global Services (UK) Ltd. v.  Asstt. DIT    be said to be chargeable to tax only when
           (IT) [2012] 22 taxmann.com 65 (Mum.)            it contains element of profit. If element of
                                                           profit is embedded in any payment, then the
           Whether reimbursement of business               assessee is bound to deduct the tax at source
           expenditure is part of total income?            at the rate prescribed or at a lesser rate
                                                           allowed by the AO. However, if there is no
           3. Ordinarily there is no element of profit     element of profit embedded in such payment
           in reimbursement. If there is no mark-up        then it cannot be said that the sum so paid
           in recovery, there can be no question of        is chargeable to tax and, consequently, the
           imputing any income  on this issue in  the      provisions of section 195 of the Act would
           hands of recipient. However, the onus to        not be applicable. Cairn Energy India Pty. Ltd.
           prove that there is no element of profit in     v.  Asstt. CIT [2009] 126 TTJ 226 (Chennai);
           such reimbursement is always on the assessee.   CIT v.  Siemens Aktiongesellschqft [2009] 177
           The basic requirement in taxing reimbursement   Taxman 81 (Bom.)
           by an Indian concern of expenditure incurred    Where it was only a simple case of reimbursement
           by NRE in India is to find out whether          of expenses on account of purchases made
           expenditure so incurred in India is business    by the sister concern, an NRE, on behalf of
           expenditure and whether the NRE had a           the assessee, an Indian company, and there


                                                                                                  119
                           January 20 To January 26, 2018 u Taxmann’s Corporate Professionals Today u Vol. 41 u 13
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17