Page 12 - Corporate_Professional_Today
P. 12
TAxAbiliTy of reimburSemenT of buSineSS exPenSeS under inCome-TAx ACT
element, it could not be regarded as income PE in India? For example: reimbursement of
chargeable to tax in hands of Abbey UK. expenditure incurred towards air fare, lodging,
Abbey Business Services (India) (P.) Ltd. v. food, etc., incurred by personnel of NRE during
Dy. CIT [2012] 23 taxmann.com 346 (Bang.) their visits to India, will be business income
Similar view was taken in another case, Dy. and not royalty, but will not be taxable as
DIT v. Tekmark Global Solutions LLC [2010] NRE did not have any PE in India. Jt. DIT
38 SOT 7 (MUM.) (OSD) v. Harvard Medical International, USA
[2011] 16 taxmann.com 69 (Mum.)
For taxing income in the hands of NRE, the
reimbursement of salary of the seconded Similarly, amount paid to its non-resident
employees, it is necessary to establish an associate enterprise towards bank guarantee
employer-employee relationship between the commission, social insurance for expatriates
Indian company and the seconded employees. who worked for execution of the contract and
Target Corpn. India (P.) Ltd., In re [2012] 24 software charges was towards reimbursement
taxmann.com 152/209 Taxman 601 (AAR) of actual expenses. It was held, following
the decision in Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v.
Where in the DTAA, it is provided that both
the parties will benefit from the services Dy. CIT [2009] 30 SOT 374/[2010] 122 ITD
rendered by the seconded employees then 216 (Mum.) (SB) that it is not chargeable to
reimbursement of the cost of the salary not income-tax in the hands of payee, Nathpa
carrying any income element will not be Jhakri Joint Venture v. Asstt. CIT [2010] 37
taxable in India in terms of Section 9(1)(vii), SOT 160 (MUM.)
read with Article 13.4 of the India-Korea
DTAA. Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Whether TDS is required on
Co. Ltd., In re [2009] 178 Taxman 100 (AAR) reimbursement of expenses?
In any case, it is necessary to ascertain exact 4. For determining whether TDS is required
nature of expenses incurred by NRE and to be made u/s 195 on reimbursement of
services rendered for which reimbursement expenses it is necessary to find out whether
was made by Indian concern for the visit of the reimbursement is chargeable to tax in
employees of NRE to the Indian company. India in the hands of NRE? A sum can
WNS Global Services (UK) Ltd. v. Asstt. DIT be said to be chargeable to tax only when
(IT) [2012] 22 taxmann.com 65 (Mum.) it contains element of profit. If element of
profit is embedded in any payment, then the
Whether reimbursement of business assessee is bound to deduct the tax at source
expenditure is part of total income? at the rate prescribed or at a lesser rate
allowed by the AO. However, if there is no
3. Ordinarily there is no element of profit element of profit embedded in such payment
in reimbursement. If there is no mark-up then it cannot be said that the sum so paid
in recovery, there can be no question of is chargeable to tax and, consequently, the
imputing any income on this issue in the provisions of section 195 of the Act would
hands of recipient. However, the onus to not be applicable. Cairn Energy India Pty. Ltd.
prove that there is no element of profit in v. Asstt. CIT [2009] 126 TTJ 226 (Chennai);
such reimbursement is always on the assessee. CIT v. Siemens Aktiongesellschqft [2009] 177
The basic requirement in taxing reimbursement Taxman 81 (Bom.)
by an Indian concern of expenditure incurred Where it was only a simple case of reimbursement
by NRE in India is to find out whether of expenses on account of purchases made
expenditure so incurred in India is business by the sister concern, an NRE, on behalf of
expenditure and whether the NRE had a the assessee, an Indian company, and there
119
January 20 To January 26, 2018 u Taxmann’s Corporate Professionals Today u Vol. 41 u 13