Page 282 - JoFA_2022
P. 282

AUDITING





                          which is highlighted later in this article.  4.  Type IV: An investment held by an investor
                            PEEC’s revised ethics interpretation:     (your FSAC or your FSAC’s Type I affiliate)
                          ■    Provides examples of SLG entities in the context   where either one of the following condi-
                            of the standard;                          tions exists:
                          ■    Changes the language in the standard to refer   y   The investor controls the affiliated entity
                            to “financial statement attest client” rather than   unless the investment in the entity is trivial
                            “state or local government entity”;         and clearly inconsequential to your FSAC’s
                          ■    Defines the terms “investor” and “investment” as   financial statements; or
                            they are used in the interpretation;      y   The investor has significant influence over
                          ■    Clarifies the circumstances or relationships that   the affiliated entity, and the investment
                            may create threats to independence; and     in the entity is material to your FSAC’s
                          ■    Highlights the importance of materiality,   financial statements.
                            control, and influence as decision points when   The revised interpretation specifies that there
                            evaluating potential affiliates.        is a rebuttable presumption that an FSAC has
                                                                    more than minimal influence over the accounting
                          THE FUNDAMENTALS                          or financial reporting process of the FSAC’s funds
                          In the revised interpretation, the Code defines the   and blended component units.
                          following four types of affiliates of SLG FSACs that   Another important element of the revised
                          require auditor independence:             interpretation is the nonattest services exception.
                          1.  Type I: The entity is included in the financial   This exception allows the auditor of the FSAC to
                            statements of your FSAC, and you don’t refer   provide nonattest services for Type II and Type
                            to another auditor in your audit report.   III affiliates if the results of the nonattest service
                          2.  Type II: The entity is included in the financial   will not be subject to financial statement attest
                            statements of your FSAC, and you do refer   procedures and any other threats can be eliminated
                            to another auditor’s report. Additionally, that   or reduced to an acceptable level by the applica-
                            entity is material to your FSAC as a whole, and   tion of safeguards.
                            your client has more than minimal influence
                            over the entity’s accounting or financial report-  MATERIALITY, CONTROL, AND INFLUENCE
                            ing process.                            While you should follow the guidance in the
                          3.  Type III: The applicable financial reporting   interpretation, keep in mind that the thresholds of
                            framework (such as GAAP) requires your   materiality, control, and influence will mean many
                            client to include an entity in its financial state-  entities and investments will not be considered
                            ments. However, your client has chosen not to   affiliates of the FSAC. There are two affiliate deci-
                            include that entity. Even though that entity is   sion trees in the implementation guide that take
                            excluded, if it is material to your client’s finan-  the auditor through the necessary considerations
                            cial statements as a whole and your client has   to conclude whether an entity or investment is
                            more than minimal influence over the entity’s   considered an affiliate of the FSAC. Each of these
                            accounting or financial reporting process, it is a   decision trees has two inflection points — the first
                            Type III affiliate.                     addressing the size, or materiality, of the entity/




         IN BRIEF

         ■  The effective date for the revised   members apply the revised    one exception for certain affiliates
          interpretation addressing state and   interpretation.               relating to nonattest services.
          local government client affiliates is   ■  Auditors must apply the   ■  The AICPA provides support,
          for years beginning after Dec. 15,   “Independence Rule” of the AICPA Code   including the Ethics Hotline, to help
          2021.                             of Professional Conduct and related   auditors evaluate relationships and
         ■  In 2020, PEEC issued an         interpretations to affiliates of their   circumstances that could result in the
          implementation guide to help      financial statement attest client, with   identification of affiliates.
         To comment on this article or to suggest an idea for another article, contact Courtney Vien at Courtney.Vien@aicpa-cima.com.


         14    |   Journal of Accountancy                                                            July 2022
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287