Page 286 - JoFA_2022
P. 286

AUDITING

























         Before discussing whether an investment is or is


         not an affiliate, it’s essential to keep in mind what


         types of investments are not included.







                          and the interactive SLG affiliate matrix to be   for this revised interpretation is for years begin-
                          of great assistance in identifying affiliates and   ning after Dec. 15, 2021. Don’t risk a breach of
                          providing documentation to support their as-  independence by failing to address your client’s
                          sessment. As a final reminder, the effective date   affiliates.   ■




         How pandemic funding could impact affiliate determinations



         This fictional example illustrates how complex it can be to   it has more than minimal influence over UC’s accounting or
         determine affiliate status and how that status can change over   financial reporting process.
         time. For instance, an entity that is not material can become so if   In this scenario, UC would be considered a Type II affiliate of
         it receives a large amount of funding, as this example shows.   Public University. Firm B should apply the “Independence Rule”
         University HealthCenter (UC) is a discretely presented   and related interpretations to UC. In addition, since UC is a Type
         component unit of Public University. UC received $12   II affiliate, Firm B does not need to evaluate the investments
         million in Provider Relief Funds (PRF), all of which are to be   held by UC for independence purposes and may use the
         reported at June 30, 2021, triggering UC’s first single audit.   nonattest services exception.
         Firm A audits UC, and Firm B audits Public University. Firm   However, if UC was not material to Public University as a whole,
         B references Firm A’s audit report in the auditor’s report on   then UC would not be an affiliate of Public University as defined
         Public University’s financial statements. While in prior years   in paragraph .03aii of the state and local government client
         UC was not material to Public University, UC’s receipt of the   affiliates interpretation. Similarly, if Public University did not
         PRF changed that, and for the year ending June 30, 2021,   have more than minimal influence over UC’s accounting or
         UC was material to Public University. Public University also   financial reporting process, UC would not be considered an
         provides accounting back-office services to UC; therefore,   affiliate of Public University.           IMAGE BY NAQIEWEI/ISTOCK





         18    |   Journal of Accountancy                                                            July 2022
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291