Page 424 - Adams and Stashak's Lameness in Horses, 7th Edition
P. 424

390   Chapter 3


            of GREs is to decrease acquisition times further and to   Moreover, excessive scanning times and prolonged
            allow three‐dimensional (3D) volumetric acquisitions   recumbence within a confined magnet space with lim­
  VetBooks.ir  where motion artifacts and relatively low signal‐to‐noise   A routine high­field MRI examination takes approxi­
                                                               ited padding can result in post‐anesthetic complications.
            with thin slices. This is especially useful in standing MRI
                                                               mately 60–90 minutes to complete.
            ratio are of concern. However, the advantage of fast 3D
            acquisition of gradient echoes comes at the expense of   For optimal assessment of an anatomical region,
            disadvantages like decreased soft tissue contrast,   images are generally obtained in three orthogonal
            increased susceptibility to magnetic field inhomogenei­  planes, sagittal, dorsal, and transverse. Sagittal images
            ties, and susceptibility artifacts. Most current clinical   serve as anatomical reference images for transverse
            protocols  in horses  use a mixture  of FSE  and GRE     sections. Transverse images are most useful to the iden­
            sequences.                                         tification of pathology, and the presence of asymmetry
              As many lesions tend to have increased signal inten­  between the medial and lateral halves of the images may
            sity on MR images while at the same time fat retains   help identify lesions. Dorsal images are useful for defini­
            high signal intensity in all sequences, eliminating the   tion of joint space width and cartilage thickness and
            high signal intensity from fat (fat suppression) markedly   also serve as reference images for transverse section
            increases the ability of recognizing high signal intensity   planes.
            from a lesion on an MR image. Fat suppression can be
            achieved by inversion recovery (STIR) or by a process of
            fat saturation.
              As a result of fat suppression, adipose tissue appears
            black instead of white, making fluid the only remaining   ARTIFACTS OF MRI
            source of high signal on a fat‐suppressed image, amidst   MRI produces a wide range of artifacts and varia­
            dark bone, soft tissues, and fat. Fat suppression is com­  tions that can confuse the interpreter. In addition, MRI
            monly used in orthopedic imaging for the detection of   is susceptible to artifacts that are created by acquisition
            abnormal fluid in bone (e.g. the navicular bone).  of images at oblique angles. Even slightly asymmetric
              Depending  on  whether  T1  or  T2  relaxation  is   positioning of image slices can create significant prob­
              measured during acquisition, sequences are called  T1   lems of image interpretation. Consequently, MRI is an
            weighted, T2 weighted, or proton density (PD) weighted   imaging technique that can easily lead the examiner to
            (between both T1 and T2). T1 and T2 relaxation times   overinterpret images as well as miss lesions.
            have characteristic values for each type of tissue and can   Artifacts can be classified as motion artifacts, mag­
            be used in combination to describe the magnetic proper­  netic field heterogeneity artifacts, and digital imaging
            ties of all tissues (Table 3.2) (Figure 3.209). PD images   artifacts.
            display any change in the density of protons as a change   Motion artifacts generally result in ghosting, which
            in signal intensity.                               results from displaced reduplications of the image in the
              An imaging protocol or series of different sequences   phase‐encoding direction, or in marked blurring of the
            is typically grouped together to image a region of inter­  image. Swaying of a standing sedated horse results in
            est. Both high‐ and low‐field musculoskeletal protocols   blurring of images, which may render the entire sequence
            typically include PD spin echo, T2‐weighted FSE, short   nondiagnostic. STIR sequences are worst affected by
            tau inversion recovery (STIR) FSE, and T1‐ and T2*‐  this type of motion artifact. Respiration and blood flow
            weighted 3D GRE sequences.                         can cause multiple motion ghosting in anesthetized
              PD images are easiest to evaluate ligament and ten­  patients (Figure 3.210).
            don  margins  and symmetry.  T2‐weighted  images  are   Artifacts from magnetic field inhomogeneity lead to
            useful for looking at fluid in soft tissues thanks to their   image distortion or alterations in signal intensity and
            high fluid contrast. However, T2‐weighted images show   are more common in low‐field than high‐field magnets.
            minimal shades of gray resulting in poor definition of   Temperature fluctuations, the presence of ferrous metal,
            soft tissue margins. STIR images show fluid in bone and   and even some wound sprays or frog packing materials
            soft tissues most easily because of their high fluid con­  like blue Play‐Doh may create field inhomogeneities.
            trast, but they have a low resolution. T2*‐weighted or   Magnetic susceptibility artifacts are a form of field inho­
            spoiled  T1‐weighted GRE sequences are used in 3D   mogeneity artifact as they are caused by the presence of
            acquisitions for evaluation of the fine anatomical detail   materials with different susceptibility to magnetization,
            in thin tissue slices.                             like ferrous metals or iron in hemoglobin and hemosid­
              The choice of protocol is determined by the type of   erin in tissues (Figure 3.211). 181,186  GREs are particularly
            magnet (high or low field), the manufacturer’s sequence   susceptible to these artifacts. Feet should be radio­
            library, the region under scrutiny, and the preference of   graphed routinely prior to MRI to ensure that all metal
            the attending clinician. Consequently, protocols may   fragments and debris have been removed from the hoof
            differ between hospitals and clinicians. With an endless   wall. 185
            number of combinations of sequences, weightings, and   Chemical shift artifacts are caused by the presence of
            section planes available, it is tempting to continue scan­  fat and water adjacent to each other. Protons from water
            ning every patient until the clinician feels all questions   and fat have different precession frequencies that causes
            have been answered. However, this approach lacks con­  the position of fat signal to shift in the frequency‐encod­
            sistency and may cause problems. Sequences and section   ing direction of the image relative to the position of
            planes should be standardized to allow for consistent   water signal. The shifting of fat signal to a different loca­
            comparison between limbs and between horses.       tion can results in spatial misregistration. This artifact is
   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429