Page 442 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 442

414    PART III   Digestive System Disorders


            sensitivity of different techniques varies, making it difficult   after onset of clinical signs; therefore, it may be necessary to
            to accurately compare results. Finally, blood is often not   repeat the test in 2 to 3 days if initial results are negative in
  VetBooks.ir  distributed homogeneously throughout the feces, and a neg-  a  dog  strongly  suspected  of  having  parvoviral  infection.
                                                                 Additionally, although dogs with parvoviral diarrhea ini-
            ative result could stem from a sampling error (especially in
            animals with lower intestinal tract problems).
                                                                 substantially during the ensuing 7 to 14 days. A repeatedly
              If fecal occult blood analysis is desired, one should feed   tially shed large amounts of virus, fecal shedding decreases
            the animal a meat-free diet for 3 to 4 days before performing   negative  test  result  therefore  does  not rule  out parvoviral
            the test. Tests using the reagents benzidine or orthotoluidine   infection, but it does necessitate a consideration of other
            to detect hemoglobin tend to be very sensitive (and hence   acute, febrile gastroenteritides (e.g., salmonellosis). This test
            less specific), whereas those using guaiac are less sensitive   is particularly valuable if there are epidemiologic consider-
            (and thus more specific). A sensitive and specific fluoromet-  ations (e.g., breeding kennel).
            ric method has been validated in dogs. Repeated testing may   ELISAs for detecting a Giardia-specific antigen in human
            be necessary to demonstrate intermittent bleeding.   (ProSpecT/Microplate ELISA assay for Giardia, Alexon,
                                                                 Inc.) and canine/feline feces (SNAP Giardia Test, Idexx
            BACTERIAL FECAL CULTURE                              Laboratories) are available. The SNAP Giardia test appears
                                                                 to be sensitive with good negative predictive value, but it
            Fecal culture is seldom indicated in small animals unless a   has poor positive predictive value at typical low prevalence
            contagious bacterial disease is strongly suspected, and even   rates when compared with IFA testing of feces. It has the
            then simply finding a “pathogenic” bacteria in an animal’s   advantage of being able to be performed in the practice. An
            feces does not confirm that it is causing disease. Culture   IFA test (MERIFLUOR Cryptosporidium/Giardia direct im-
            results must be correlated with clinical signs and the results   munofluorescent kit, Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) is probably
            of other laboratory tests. The clinician should always contact   the most sensitive and specific test for giardiasis but requires
            the laboratory before collecting/submitting feces, informing   that feces be sent to a commercial laboratory.
            them specifically what bacteria to attempt to grow; there are   ELISAs for detecting cryptosporidial antigens in feces
            specific techniques for collection, submission, and culture   (ProSpecT  Cryptosporidium  Microplate Assay,  Meridian
            for most fecal pathogens.  Fecal culture cannot be used to   Diagnostics, Inc. and ProSpecT Cryptosporidium Micro-
            diagnose small intestinal antibiotic-responsive enteropathy   plate Assay, Remel, Inc.) are more sensitive than routine
            (ARE), also called dysbiosis.                        fecal examinations. Special staining of fecal smears with a
              Potential pathogens most commonly cultured from feces   modified Ziehl-Neelsen acid-fast technique is also sensi-
            from small animals include Clostridium perfringens, Salmo-  tive, albeit more labor intensive. An IFA test (MERIFLUOR
            nella spp., E. coli, and Campylobacter jejuni. Confirmation   Cryptosporidium/Giardia direct immunofluorescent kit,
            of toxin production by specific bacteria can be performed   Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) is not as sensitive as ELISA when
            using PCR techniques or bioassay. Salmonella spp. are best   looking for cryptosporidia.
            cultured by inoculating at least 1 g of fresh feces into an   Assays for bacterial toxins in feces are typically valuable
            enrichment medium and subsequently a selective medium   for implicating specific bacteria as causing diarrhea in people,
            specific for  Salmonella spp.  Salmonella can also be grown   but a positive test in a dog or cat is not prima facia evidence
            from colonic mucosa. To culture C. jejuni, very fresh feces   it is causing disease. C. difficile in particular is of uncertain
            must be inoculated onto selective media and incubated at   pathogenic significance in dogs and cats. ELISA tests (C.
            approximately 40° C instead of 37° C. If inoculation is to be   perfringens Enterotoxin Test, TechLab) and reverse passive
            delayed, special transport media should be used, not routine   latex agglutination tests (Oxoid PET-RPLA, Unipath Co.)
            commercial transport devices (e.g., culturette swabs).   for C. perfringens enterotoxin are available, but the results
            Candida spp. are occasionally cultured from feces. Growing   do not clearly correlate with clinical disease.
            Candida is often hard to interpret, but the organisms might   PCR testing for antigens in feces has become popular
            cause problems in some animals (e.g., those receiving    because of its sensitivity and specificity, but finding any of
            chemotherapy).                                       numerous agents in feces does not guarantee that the agent
              There is a culture technique (InPouch TF, BioMed Diag-  is responsible for disease. There are fecal PCR panels that
            nostics) for  Tritrichomonas blagburni in feline feces. The   can detect Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Salmonella, C. perfrin-
            culture technique can be done in the practice and appears to   gens enterotoxin A, enteric coronavirus, parvovirus, and/
            be more sensitive than direct fecal examination but less sen-  or distemper virus in canine feces. Likewise there are fecal
            sitive than PCR.                                     PCR panels that detect  Tritrichomonas  blagburni,  Giardia,
                                                                 Cryptosporidium, Toxoplasma gondii, Salmonella, C. perfrin-
            ELISA, IFA, AND PCR FECAL ANALYSES                   gens enterotoxin A, coronavirus, and/or panleukopenia virus
                                                                 in feline feces. The GI Lab (Texas A&M University) also
            ELISA can be used to detect antibodies or antigens. The test   offers PCR testing for  C.  jejuni and  C. coli. In all cases, a
            for canine parvovirus is very specific. However, parvovirus   positive PCR does not guarantee that the agent is producing
            may not be excreted in the feces for the first 24 to 48 hours   clinical disease.
   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447