Page 443 - Small Animal Internal Medicine, 6th Edition
P. 443

CHAPTER 27   Diagnostic Tests for the Alimentary Tract   415


            CYTOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FECES                        by abdominal palpation (e.g., gastric mass, foreign object,
                                                                 splenic parenchymal mass). Plain radiographs should always
  VetBooks.ir  Fecal cytologic evaluations may identify etiologic agents   be obtained before contrast-enhanced radiographs because
                                                                 (1) the  former may be  diagnostic  and eliminate the  need
            or  inflammatory  cells.  In  this method a  thin,  air-dried
            smear is stained with Gram or a Romanowsky-type stain
                                                                 be found to be contraindicated (e.g., evidence of GI tract
            (e.g., Diff-Quik). The latter identifies cells better than Gram     for contrast studies, (2) contrast-enhanced radiographs may
            stain does.                                          leakage), and (3) plain radiographs are needed to ensure a
              Finding excessive numbers of spore-forming bacteria   correct radiographic technique during the contrast proce-
            (e.g.,  >3-4 per 1000× field) was once thought to strongly   dure. Contrast-enhanced radiographs may be able to detect
            suggest clostridial colitis (see Fig. 31.1). However, the pres-  abnormalities (e.g., a gastric outflow tract obstruction) that
            ence of spores is neither specific nor sensitive for clostridial   plain radiographs cannot.
            colitis.  Finding  that  the  bacterial  population  is  relatively   Radiographs are generally useful in the diagnostic workup
            uniform morphologically is of uncertain value, other than to   of animals with dysphagia, regurgitation, vomiting, abdomi-
            show that the normal bacterial flora is disrupted. However,   nal mass or distention, abdominal pain, or acute abdomen.
            no comments can be made relative to cause or effect.  They are occasionally helpful in animals with constipation,
              Short,  curved,  gram-negative rods  (i.e.,  “commas”  or   weight loss, or hyporexia of unknown cause, but other tests
            “seagull wings”) are supposedly suggestive of campylobacte-  are usually indicated first in such animals and often render
            riosis, but the value of this test in dogs and cats is doubtful.   radiographs unnecessary. Radiographic findings are rarely
            The larger spirochetes, which are often plentiful in diarrheic   diagnostic in dogs or cats with diarrhea or copious abdomi-
            feces, are not C. jejuni and are of uncertain pathogenicity.   nal effusion.
            Fungal organisms (e.g., Histoplasma capsulatum, Cyniclomy-
            ces guttulatus, Candida spp.) are rarely found by fecal exami-
            nation; cytologic examination of mucosal scrapings or   ULTRASONOGRAPHY OF THE
            histologic examination of biopsy specimens is usually neces-  ALIMENTARY TRACT
            sary to diagnose histoplasmosis.
              Leukocytes in feces indicate a transmural colonic inflam-  Ultrasonography  may  be  done  in  combination  with  or
            mation  instead  of just  superficial mucosal  inflammation.   instead of radiography. It is extremely operator dependent.
            However, a definitive diagnosis of a particular cause is not   It is often useful in animals with an acute abdomen, abdomi-
            possible.                                            nal  effusion,  vomiting,  chronic  diarrhea,  weight  loss,  or
                                                                 hyporexia of unknown cause and also in those with an
                                                                 abdominal mass, distention, or pain. Ultrasonography often
            ELECTRON MICROSCOPY                                  identifies pancreatitis, infiltrations in various organs, and
                                                                 intussusceptions that radiography misses. Furthermore,
            Electron microscopy can be used to find various viral par-  while effusions render radiographs useless, they enhance
            ticles (e.g., coronavirus, parvovirus, astrovirus) in feces.   ultrasonographic contrast. Ultrasonography is often more
            Because ELISA is usually adequate for detecting parvovirus,   informative than radiography for determining whether an
            electron microscopy is rarely necessary. However, it is rea-  animal  with  an  acute  abdomen  requires  surgery.  Finally,
            sonable to choose this technique if other test results are not   ultrasonography can be used to guide percutaneous aspira-
            diagnostic and there are epidemiologic considerations. Fecal   tion and biopsy of intraabdominal lesions that would other-
            samples for electron microscopy analysis should be obtained   wise necessitate surgery or laparoscopy.
            early in the disease because fecal viral concentrations may
            decrease dramatically within 7 to 14 days after the onset of
            signs. Furthermore, some delicate viruses (e.g., coronavirus)   Techniques
            degenerate quickly, and the feces from animals suspected of   A 5-MHz probe is probably the most utilitarian. Hair is often
            having such an infection must be handled appropriately if   clipped so that there is no trapped air that could compromise
            meaningful results are to be obtained. It is important that   image quality.
            clinicians contact their laboratory for instructions on sample
            handling.
                                                                 Findings
                                                                 The thickness, echodensity, and homogeneity of organs (e.g.,
            RADIOGRAPHY OF THE                                   liver, spleen, intestine, stomach, mesenteric lymph nodes,
            ALIMENTARY TRACT                                     masses) may be assessed. Intraparenchymal infiltrates that
                                                                 cannot be detected radiographically may also be found. The
            Radiography allows evaluation of  structures that  cannot   particular ultrasonographic findings seen in specific disor-
            be adequately assessed during physical examination (e.g.,   ders of the alimentary tract are discussed in subsequent
            esophagus, stomach) and may detect abnormalities missed   chapters dealing with the disorders.
   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448