Page 145 - Equine Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Reproduction, 2nd Edition
P. 145

120                                        CHAPTER 1



  VetBooks.ir  is sepsis of the DDFT and the flexor cortex of the  Aetiology/pathophysiology
                                                          Primary injury to the DDFT may be the result
           navicular bone. Both can have a negative impact and,
           in addition, concurrent infection of the other syno-
                                                          stance phase, repetitive overload stress, or a com-
           vial structures is likely to deteriorate the prognosis.   of acute traumatic fibre tearing at the end of the
           Furthermore, persistent severe lameness in one limb   bination of both. Predisposition to primary ten-
           predisposes the animal to contralateral support limb   don injury may increase as degenerative ageing
           laminitis. Historically, the prognosis for survival has   changes accumulate in the tendon. Injury to the
           been poor (50% or less) and for return to athletic   distal portion of the tendon may also result from
           function even worse at around 30%. Recent reports   distal extension of tendinopathy at the level of the
           suggest that the prognosis has significantly improved,   DDFT sheath. Possible risk factors include hoof
           although they are somewhat variable, with survival   conformation, the angle of the distal phalanx and
           rates of 80% or better and return to function rates   the horse’s athletic discipline. Horses jumping over
           60% or better, following bursoscopy or bursotomy.   fences have a significantly higher risk of injuring
           However, another recent study in which many of the   the digital portion of the tendon than horses that
           injuries also involved the DIP joint, reported a lower   are used for other sporting endeavours. Horses
           survival rate of between 50% and 60%. Careful con-  that have undergone a palmar digital neurectomy
           sideration of clinical reports is always necessary as   are  at  significant  risk  of  deterioration  of  existing
           some do not always account for horses euthanased   tendon pathology.
           because of the expense of treatment, which can be
           considerable, or the fact that clinicians are still jus-  Clinical presentation
           tifiably cautious about the prognosis for return to   There are generally no visible or palpable abnor-
           function. In comparison, puncture wounds of the   malities  in horses with  distal  tendinopathy of  the
           foot that do not involve a synovial structure have a   DDFT. Occasionally, distension of the DDFT
           very significantly better overall prognosis.   sheath is present in horses with a lesion that extends
                                                          proximally to the level of the sheath. Even more
           DEEP DIGITAL FLEXOR                            rarely, a focal, painful, firm soft-tissue swelling
           TENDINOPATHY IN THE FOOT                       can be appreciated on the palmarodistal aspect of
                                                          the pastern. Flexion and extension tests of the digit
           Definition/overview                            produce variable results but are not specific. Toe
           Since the advent of equine foot MRI, it has become   elevation, with a wooden wedge, makes some horses
           clear that tendinopathy or tendinitis of the DDFT is   worse, but it does not distinguish between horses
           the most common soft-tissue injury causing lameness   with tendon pain and other forms of palmar foot
           in the horse’s foot. It is responsible for around 30–50%   pain. Surprisingly, in a considerable number of ten-
           of all foot lameness without radiographic abnormali-  don injury cases, elevation of the heel with a wooden
           ties. Tendinitis of the digital portion of the DDFT   wedge of 15–20° results in marked exacerbation of
           may occur alone, in conjunction with navicular bone   lameness. Lameness varies substantially in severity,
           pathology or as one component of a complex of mul-  but some horses will experience episodes of severe
           tiple soft-tissue injuries in the foot. Pathological sur-  lameness and may be seen intermittently point-
           veys have recognised four different lesion types in the   ing the affected foot at rest. Approximately 50% of
           distal portion of the DDFT: core lesions; dorsal abra-  horses are presented with an acute-onset, moderate
           sions and tears; sagittal plane and oblique splits; and   to severe lameness while the other 50% experience
           insertional lesions (including entheseopathy). It  is   a  more  insidious  disease  progression.  Some  horses
           thought that these lesions may be primarily degener-  are presented for poor performance evaluation and
           ative in nature. Lesions occur most commonly at the   may not even show lameness when trotting in a
           level of the navicular bone and proximal aspect of the   straight line. All affected horses are lame when trot-
           navicular bursa, less commonly at the insertion and   ting in a circle on hard ground, especially when the
           least of all at the level of the proximal interphalangeal   affected limb is on the inside. Lameness is unilateral
           joint and proximal phalanx.                    in approximately 60% of horses.
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150