Page 20 - GP Fall 2022_Neat
P. 20

Restoring Cervical Lesions with Microfilled Composite


                          Authors: Arthur R. Volker DDS, MSEd, FAGD, FACD and Aadel Soleymani, DDS



        Introduction                            microfilled  composite  is  radiolucency  must be inserted at a steep angle, otherwise,
        The causes of cervical lesions have been at-  which is less likely to be an esthetic  is-  the strip may fold. Additionally, interproxi-
        tributed to many factors, including hygiene,   sue with cervical restorations  as it might  mal contacts must be present, or the matrix
        abrasion, attrition, and parafunctional habits   be in a Class III restoration. Anecdotally,  will not hold in place. Once the matrix is se-
        of  occlusion  (abfraction).  While  carious   the flexure of microfilled composite may  cured in place, wedges can be used to affix
                             1-4
        cervical lesions require restorative interven-  provide an advantage  in cases  where  its position. Figure 4 shows the placement
        tion, the treatment of non-carious cervical   there is an  occlusal contribution to the  from the incisal view.
        lesions (NCCL) has been less standardized,   cervical lesion.
        especially  in cases of gingival recession.
        In 2010, Pini-Prato created a classification  Clinical Example
        system for these lesions based on both the  A 48-year-old male presented to the office
        absence  or presence  of an intact  cemen-  with the chief complaint of thermal sensitiv-
        to-enamel junction (CEJ) and if a step was  ity localized to #8, 9 and 10 when brushing
        present or not.  Common tactics to address  or consuming cold foods. An examination
                    5
        NCCLs that also have gingival recession in-  revealed failing cervical restorations on #8
        cludes the use of a coronally-advanced flap   and #9, as well as a cervical  lesion with
                                           6
        either with or without a a tissue graft. 7  tooth volume loss on #10 (Figure 1).
                                                                                   Figure 4. Occlusal view of seated Mylar strip.
        While  these  periodontal  approaches  have
        proven to be effective  in    addressing the                               The teeth were etched (Figure 5) and bond-
        gingival recession, restorative treatment is                               ed (Figure 6). Using a #1 sable brush, an A2
        indicated  in cases of where there  is tooth
        volume loss   or dentin hypersensitivity. A
        combination  approach of periodontal and
        restoriative  treatment is recommended  in
        cases  where  there  is  gingival  recession  in
        addition to cervical tooth structure loss. 8
                                              Figure 1.  Pre-operative  presentation  showing
        This article  will demonstrate  a restorative   failing restorations and tooth volume loss.
        technique  to address both carious and
        non-carious cervical lesions.         The teeth were anesthetized with 2% lido-
                                              caine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The pre-  Figure 5. Tooth etched.
        Restorative Options                   vious restorations and caries on #8 and #9
                                              were removed. To ensure a smooth optical
        1. RMGI                               transition  between tooth and composite, a
          Resin  Modified  Glass  Ionomers  (RMGI)  1.5-2mm tall transition zone was prepared
           work  effectively for restoring cervical  using a round diamond (Figure 2).
           lesions.  The technique  is less technique
           sensitive than using a composite resin.
           RMGI is moisture tolerant and can be used
           in cases where isolation may be difficult.
           However,  drawbacks  of  RMGI  include                                  Figure 6. Placement of bonding agent.
           color instability and surface roughness. 9
                                                                                   shade Opaquer (Creative Color, Cosmedent,
        2. Composite Resin                                                         Chicago, IL) was placed in both the cervical
          While  both  RMGI  and  composite  res-                                  and transitional areas, then cured (Figure 7).
           in perform well in subgingival areas,                                   A small amount of flowable composite was
                                          10
           current recommendations  call  for the   Figure 2.  Creating transition preparation.  injected into the sulcular area, taking care
           use of composite resin as the outermost
           layer of a cervical restoration if RMGI is  A flat Mylar strip was placed into the sulcus
           used. The advantages of composite resin  (Figure 3). To obtain a good seal, the matrix
           compared to RMGI are color stability,
                                          11
           esthetics, and wear resistance.  All sub-
                                   12
                  8
           categories  of composite resin (micro-
           filled, nanofilled, flowable, etc.) tend to
           perform well clinically. 13
          Microfilled composites may prove to be
           a good choice for cervical restorations as                              Figure 7. Flowable opaquer placed on cervical
           they are easy to polish and demonstrate                                 region and transition area.
           a sustained polish.  A disadvantage  of
                          14
                                              Figure 3. Mylar strip inserted into the sulcular
        www.nysagd.org l Fall 2022 l GP 20    area.
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25