Page 274 - KAZOVA - ENGLISH

new drywall was installed. In this way it was presented as being a
new firm. After that Kazova was closed. NES TRIKO also closed,
on the same date…

After the workers started resistance the drywall wall was torn
down and a brick one replaced it. The workers tried to get their

hands on the machines by pursuing sequestration. However, the
person who claimed to be the owner of NES TRIKO lodged an
objection to the sequestration. In the objection by Abdulkadir
Nergis, it was stated that the firm closed at the start of February
2013 and the machine fixtures, weaving machines and other textile
machines were sold to MIDYATLI LTD. Nes Triko had received
these machines from Kazova A.S. in which the Somuncu families
were partners and owners, and had sold them to the firm called
Midyatli Ltd. It appeared there was no problem. Everything was

in accordance with the law. But the problem lay with who was a
partner of Midyatli Ltd. Midyatli Ltd.’s partnership was with none
other than the SOMUNCU FAMILY. So the SOMUNCU FAM-
ILY which was the owner of Kazova was ALSO THE OWNER OF
THE MIDYATLI COMPANY. And what Abdulkadir Nergis was
doing was nothing other than transferring machines between two
companies, both owned by the same family.

Everyone can understand this as collusion, a sham sale. But

the laws do not comprehend this, nor do judges.

On 12 November the Kazova worker went to court concern-
ing the objection to their sequestration. The court implemented
the law and cancelled the Kazova workers’ sequestration. The ob-
jection by the owner of the shell company was found to be valid.
The lawyer of the shell company was also present at the hearing.

274