Page 684 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo

Division of what? Of everything, because the Principle of Division bestows to the
Emperor or King, Carthaginian, English or Yankee, the right to divide the structure of the
populations. It must be compared immediately, to stand out the differences: the Principle of
Honour of the Greco-Roman imperialists was essentially ethic and it created the obligation to
procure the common good, to valorize the value of the brave; on the contrary, the Principle of
Division of the Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon imperialists was fundamentally juridic and amoral
and the generated the right to divide to assure the value of those who are useful, to protect
the democratic freedom to value being useful, producing, serving.

Here are the fundamental differences between both models: the ethic against the
juridical and amoral; the moral obligation to assure the common good, agaist the amoral right
to divide the common good to extract its untilitary value. The Greco-Roman Imperialism
produced «citizens of the Empire», honourable title that in no way undermined their
nationality of racial pride. The Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon Imperialism models «citizens of the
World», ambiguous and dishonourable title that most of times occults the untold betrayal.

To the citizens of the Empire we already know them by the History. It is of interest,
whereas to know. How are the «citizens of the World», analogous title to the «slave of the
Synarchy»? Well, it treats about beings that have been conformed according to the
Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon model, it means, beings who have suffered all the modes of the
Principle of Division. They are habitually internationalists because their nationality has been
divided and disaggregated: they believe that the international saves the difference between
populations. They are decided pacifists because their psychic structure was divided
freudianilly and their warrior instinct qualified of «primitive aggressive tendencies that are
originated in the cortex, animal brain, and emerges through the Unconscious»: for the
psychoanalytic Culture, the warrior instinct is a disgraceful impulse, almost animal, extremely
dangerous «because it can incarnate in the Myth of the Hero» and become dominant in the
conscious; who are indoctrinated thus, identify the war with savagery, and believe that the
peace must be achieved at any cost because in that social state it is possible to demonstrate the
utility serving to the pacifist Imperialism, World Government, Synarchy, or whatever be
named the system that exploits them. These exemplaries are colorblind to the nationality and
their warrior instinc has been locked; therefore they lack of heroism, of capacity of patriotic
reaction, they are beings psychologically mutilated that believe in the union of many concepts
impossible to unify under a Carthagianian-Anglo Saxon Imperialism: peace, happiness,
creation, progress, freedom, civilization of love, universal fraternity, and so forth. Naturally, in
our Age, they can be good communists or good liberals, indistinctly.

But apart of internationalists or pacifists they can be collaborators of the
Carthaginian imperial system, working from inside of their Nations, or in those that don’t

684