Page 687 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo
P. 687

mother with her son re-establishign the service. It must be warned that the character of the
               Priestly Investiture has remained very clear: the King doesn’t carry the Sword: he requests it; he
               is a Priest. Let’s remember that the Bible is a Sacred Book and that on it even the last apex has a
               meaning. We hear daily the evangelist preachers qualifying the Bible as «The Word of God». But
               there are those who blindly believe that it is true: they are the Kabbalists Rabbis, the same that,
               precisely,  manage  the  Masonry  and  tens  of  Secret  Societies  of  Synarchy  in  secrecy,
               organizations in which, casually, militate the «men of the State» that lead the Carthaginian-
               Anglo Saxon Imperialism.


                      Thereby it is a serious thing the Principle that is derived from the Biblic metaphor. What
               means, the rabbinic terms, those images? That the Priest-King has the right to request the
               Sword and divide: and that such fact is fair. Not only fair, but the fount of Justice. The
               Justice at the beginning of the judgement in not manifested, it is unknown really who is the
               mother: the Justice made itself present a posteriori that the Priest-King exerted the
               right to divide. In sum: the Priest-King takes the Sword, «the Power of the State», and
               exerts the right to divide the body of the child, «a small population»¸and that is fair,
               produces the Justice, the own fundament of the Priest-King; conclusion: the right of
               the King to divide the bases justify the rupture and fortify the Throne.

                      With  their  usual  realism,  the  Rabbis  Doctors  have  interpreted  in  this  manner  the
               Solomonic Judgement and have synthetized it in the Talmud, from where surely Machiavello
               learnt it: «The King must divide to reign».


                      This non-Aryan principle, Judaic and amoral, has been constituted in the ruler axiom of
               the Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon imperialists. They divide everything, as I demonstrated before,
               and even at the moment in which they left, for example from a colony, they let it divided in all
               the possible orders, from the territorial till the political and economic, counting for this task, of
               course, with their cohorts of sepoys.

                      Remember, neffe¸that the famous «International Division of the Work» is a concept
               of  the  English  Liberalism  of  the  XIX  century.  Now  you  can  see  that  it  is  inspired  in  the
               Talmudic Principles: «the King, if he is Wise, must divide the bases to reign»; «the King
               is the only whole, to whom none of the parts can reach»; «the parts of the Kingdom,
               worth while are useful». Naturally, this Kigndom is Malkhouth, the tenth Sephirah.









                                                           687
   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692