Page 685 - Microsoft Word - Belicena respaldo

believe, to favour the contribution of utilitary value that the imperialists have assigned to their
population or country; or can be international agents of the Imperialism and consecrate
themselves to execute their plans. Anywise, their taks will consist, from inside or form outside,

to divide, i.e., to apply the Principle of Division there were something united exists that is
opposed to the Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon Imperialism: intrigue, the bribery, the corruption,
the Machavellianism, the indiousness, the defamation, the publicity, the misinformation, etc.,
all the means and crimes will be valid to divide everyone and fortify the parts that are useful
and serve to the foreign Imperialism. In the formation of lackeys of this kind, the
Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon Imperialism has always excelled. The classic type is the «sepoy».

Naturally, I am not referring to the Hindu sepoy, the concrete man who many times
with incredible courage tried to free himself from the English despoiler, but to the typo of the
sepoy, to the class of man «valuable to its service» that the English wanted to fabricate
dividing all his principles. In Carthage existed thousands of mercenaries of this kind. In Asia
and in Africa the English would fabricate them by hundreds of thousands.

Thus we arrive to Chiang Kai-Shek, which was the classic type of sepoy at the service of
colonial potence Carthaginian-Anglo Saxon, and we realized that at defining the terms of such
personage aright can’t have anything of «nationalist» and much of imperialist agent. He, as
Ghandi in the India, Marcos in the Philippines, F. Duvailer Haiti, Reza Pahlevi in Iran, Tito in
Yugoslavia, Fidel Castro in Cuba, and any uncountable tyrants of Asia, Africa and Latin
America, were great sepoys who systematically divided the real nationalist movements of their
countries and then crushed them part by part; it is understood: the nationalism is the worst
enemy of the Carthaginian- AngloSaxon Imperialism.

Well now, neffe: I have demonstrated you that the Supreme Principle of the
Carthaginian-AngloSaxon Imperialism is the Principle of Division and I opposed it to the
Principle of Honour, that fundaments the Aryan Universal Imperialism. Then: it must be added
that such «Principle of Division» is essentially non-Aryan.

But is not only about a presumption, of the fact that as Carthaginians as Phoenicians,
Egyptians, Assyrians, Babylonians, etc., have employed it profoundly, because in the Aryan
Realms where the priestly hypocrisy has predominated for some period the Principle of
Division has been used as well, due to the Priestly castes and the Synarchy also registers both
common interests. The proof of their Aryan origin is, as could not be in other way, in their
biblical procedence. That’s to say, the Principle, that gives the Right to Divide, although
ancient and not Aryan, finds its juridical formulation in the population that whorshipps a God
of Justice, One that puts the Tablets of the Law; and that population is Israel, the Chosen
People by Jehovah-Satan.

685