Page 131 - GB SUBJECTS NEW - ALL PAGE NO

`

While so, Sri M. Gunasekhar Reddy filed W.P.No.30981/2011 in the Hon’ble H.C of
A.P against(1) CC&RCS, Hyderabad(2) DCO, Chittoor (3) Asst.Registrar-cum-Insp
Officer, Tpt(4) TTD ECCS with prayer to direct the respondents to consider the case of the
petitioner for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant in the existing vacancy as per the
cadre strength of TTD ECCS vide Proc. Dt.2.7.2011.

Whereas, the writ petition was disposed on 12.12.2011 at admission stage with
directions to first respondent as below:

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate
to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representation
dt.17.11.2007 filed by the Petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, within
a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the
above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. There
shall be no order as to costs.

st
As per above Judgment, the 1 respondent i.e. the CC&RCS, Hyderabad was
directed to consider and dispose of the representation dt.17.11.2007 of the petitioner
within 6 weeks. Accordingly, the CC&RCS issued above proceedings dt.7.5.2012
ordering that the requests of 4 persons (1) A. Sadasiva Reddy as L.D.Typist
(2) M. Gunasekhar Reddy (3) A. Chandra Reddy and (4) M. Madhusudhan Reddy as
Junior Assistants may be considered and reasoned as under purely on humanitarian
grounds and thus, the President / Manager of TTD ECCS is directed to take necessary
action and appoint the above four individuals for the above posts, keeping in view the
provisions of Sec.116(c) of APCS Act-1964 and they are entitled to claim seniority and
monetary benefits from the date of joining in the posts.

Obeying the orders of the Hon’ble High Court of AP, the CC&RCS issued
proceedings i.e. disposed of the representations of the petitioners, but the same was not
implemented as not tenable by the Society in view of (i) already surplus staff available in
the society (ii) insufficient workload prevailing in society (iii) excess financial commitment
in terms of Sec.116(c).

In the meanwhile, M. Gunasekhar Reddy, A. Chandra Reddy, M. Madhusudhan
Reddy, A. Sadasiva Reddy filed W.P.No.20223/2012 in the Hon’ble H.C of AP against the
CC&RCS / TTD ECCSseeking directions to declare the action of TTD ECCS in not
appointing the petitioners in pursuance of Proc. dt.7.5.2012 of CC&RCS as illegal and
consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service w.e.f. 7.5.2012
with all consequent benefits.The Hon’ble H.C of AP in its Order dt.5.7.2012 directed the
respondents to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the
affidavit filed therewith, this writ petition should not be admitted.The Society filed counter
in W.P.No.20223/2012 and the writ petition is pending in the Hon’ble H.C of AP.Further,
Sri A. Sadasiva Reddy filed W.P.No.24243/2015 in the Hon’ble H.C of AP seeking
appointment as L.D.Typist in TTD ECCS.

119