Page 45 - The Origin of Life and the Universe - International Conference 2016

The Origin of Life and the Universe

5 , very complex structure, and random effects can
only harm it. The American geneticist B. G.
6 . Ranganathan explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature.
Secondly, most mutations are harmful since they
All mutations have always proved to be harmful are random, rather than orderly changes in the
for human beings as well as all other living structure of genes; any random change in a
things. Since the beginning of the twentieth highly ordered system will be for the worse, not
century, evolutionary biologists have sought ex- for the better. For example, if an earthquake
amples of beneficial mutations by creating mutant were to shake a highly ordered structure such
flies. But these efforts have always resulted in as a building, there would be a random change
sick and deformed creatures. This fact is a in the framework of the building which, in all
great impasse in terms of Darwinist claims. probability, would not be an improvement. (B.
In order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsylvania: The
the "Modern Synthetic Theory," or as it is more Banner of Truth Trust, 1988, p. 7)
commonly known, Neo-Darwinism, at the end Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which
of the 1930s. Neo-Darwinism added mutations, is useful, that is, which is observed to develop
which are distortions formed in the genes of the genetic code, has been observed so far. All
living beings due to such external factors as ra- mutations have proved to be harmful. It was un-
diation or replication errors, as the "cause of fa- derstood that mutation, which is presented as
vorable variations" in addition to natural mutation. an "evolutionary mechanism," is actually a
Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, genetic occurrence that harms living things, and
despite their own awareness of its scientific in- leaves them disabled. (The most common effect
validity, is neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains of mutation on human beings is cancer.) Of
that millions of living beings formed as a result course, a destructive mechanism cannot be an
of a process whereby numerous complex organs "evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on
of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and the other hand, "can do nothing by itself," as
wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that
disorders. Yet, there is an outright scientific fact there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature.
that totally undermines this theory: Mutations Since no evolutionary mechanism exists, no
do not cause living beings to develop; on the such imaginary process called "evolution" could
contrary, they are always harmful. have taken place.
The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a
All mutations observed on living beings
have proved to be harmful. The reason
is that the DNA has a very complex
DNA Damage structure, and random effects on this
molecule will only harm the organism.
The result of any change due to muta-
tions will only result in genetic disor-
ders, fatality or disability. On the side,
there are examples of deformed living
beings that were subjected to
mutations.

Debilitated
organisms due 43
to mutations