Page 90 - The Origin of Life and the Universe - International Conference 2016
P. 90

The Origin of Life and the Universe

        tation to occur at the same time, mathematicians  Sorbonne, wrote this on the subject:
        still say the problem of time is an acute dilemma  The probability of dust carried by the wind repro-
        for Darwinists. Even Professor of Paleontology  ducing Dürer's "Melancholia" is less infinitesimal
        George G. Simpson, one of the most unrepentant  than the probability of copy errors in the DNA
        Darwinists, clearly states that it would take an in-  molecules leading to the formation of the eye. 9
        finite length of time for five mutations to happen  Darwinists ignore this miraculous system present
        at the same time.6 An infinite amount of time me-  in DNA and avoid going deeply into the subject
        ans zero probability. And that is a probability
                                            and coming up with any explanation of it; yet
        which applies to all the structures and organs  they construct a scenario of the history of life
        possessed by living things. Thus, there is no  built on replication errors with an almost zero
        possibility of the glorious variety of life we see in  possibility of happening. This once again reveals
        our daily lives coming about through mutations.  the nonsensical nature of Darwinist logic.
          The evolutionist George G. Simpson has per-  Following the realization that Darwin's idea of
        formed another calculation regarding the mutation  natural selection most definitely did not constitute
        claim in question. He admitted that in a community  an account of evolution and the emergence of
        of 100 million individuals, which could hypothetically  the laws of genetics becoming a lethal blow to
        produce a new generation every day, a positive  Darwinism, the claim of the
        outcome from mutations would only take place
                                                           which had been the main weapon
        once every 274 billion years. That number is  of neo-Darwinism, was seen to be no more than
        many times greater than the age of the Earth, es-  a deception. It is absolutely ridiculous to claim
        timated to be at 4.5 billion years old.7 These, of  that a mechanism such as a mutation, which da-
        course, are all calculations assuming that mutations  mages, destroys and kills the living organism, as
        have a positive effect on the generations which  well as sometimes harming all subsequent gene-
        gave rise to them, and on subsequent generations;  rations, can give rise to entirely new living things.
        but no such assumption applies in the real world.
                                            But masses of people were taken in by this lie for
                                            years. Darwinist scientists of course know that
          Why Is the Body That Is Supposedly Evolving   mutations have no such miraculous power. Even
          Protected against Mutations?      Richard Dawkins, one of the present day's most
          All evolutionist scientists know that the probability  fervid Darwinists, admits that "most mutations
        of a replication error occurring in a living organism's  are deleterious, so some undesirable side effect
        DNA for no reason is very low. Research has re-  is pretty likely." The reason why Darwinists still
                                                      10
        vealed that there are protective elements in the  propose this discredited claim as a mechanism
        cell that prevent genetic errors from arising. The  for evolution is their devotion to the superstitious
        information in DNA cannot be copied in the ab-  religion of Darwinism.
        sence of particular enzymes that control one
        another against errors. These include double-
                                            1- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master
        filter enzymes for ensuring that the right amino  Books, 2001, s. 74-75
                                            2- Jonathan Welss, Ph.D., The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent
        acid binds to the right tRNA. One filter rejects  Design, Regnery Publishing Inc., Washington, 2006, sf.34
        amino acids that are too large, and the other  3- Jonathan Welss, Ph.D., The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent
                                            Design, Regnery Publishing Inc., Washington, 2006, sf.36
        those that are too small. This is a very sensitive  4- Jonathan Wells, Evrimin İkonları, Gelenek yayınları, Ocak 2003, s. 172-173
                                            5- Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Sphere Books Ltd., 1984, s.
        and rational system. There are also enzymes  4
                                            6- Gordon Rattray Taylor, The Great Evolution Mystery, Sphere Books Ltd., 1984, s.
        that do final checks against the possibility of any  230
        error arising in this intelligent system. Scientists  7- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master
                                            Books, 2001, s. 81
        have concluded that they could not imagine a  8- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master
                                            Books, 2001, s. 74-75
        better cellular control and protection system aimed  9- Nicholas Comninellis, Creative Defense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master
        at maintaining the integrity of DNA. 8  Books, 2001, s. 81
                                            10- Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, 1999, s.
                Pierre Paul Grassé, who spent 30  141
               years as professor of evolution at the
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95