Page 92 - The Origin of Life and the Universe - International Conference 2016

The Origin of Life and the Universe

what he says. Darwin said: “Why, if species have descended from other
species by insensibly fine gradations.” So he said species evolve to other
species gradually and randomly through transitional forms. “…do we not
everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?” We do not see transitional
forms because there are no transitional forms of course. “Why is not all
nature in confusion instead of the species being, as we see them, well
defined? But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have
existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the
crust of the Earth? Why then is not every geological formation and every
stratum full of such intermediate links?” (Charles Darwin, The Origin of
Species, p. 172, 280) Darwin himself said there are no transitional forms.
Of course, no transitional forms means, no evolution. He said why do not
we have them, because we do not have a transitional form. He said we look
at every layer, single layer, so there are a lot of fossils, more than enough
fossils in this time. But he said maybe in the future, it will be found.
Now we look at today, this is one of the most prominent paleontologists.
Paleontologist means fossil scientist. This is the most prominent paleontologist
of the world and he is a Darwinist. His name is Niles Eldredge, he is the
curator of the American Natural History Museum. He said: “The record
jumps,” the fossil record jumps he said. Horses, elephants, birds, reptiles,
and nothing in between, it jumps. That means no transitional forms. “…
and all the evidence shows that the record is real.” He said the evidence
shows that this record is real. “The gaps we see,” that means no transitional
forms we see, “reflect real events in life's history - not the artifact of a poor
fossil record.” (Niles Eldredge and Ian Tattersall, The Myths of Human
Evolution, Columbia University Press, 1982, p. 59)
So he admits that there are no transitional forms. Darwin said there
are no transitional forms. Stephen Jay Gould said there are no transitional
forms, then we ask of course why do these people defend Darwinism and
evolution if there are no transitional forms? That is, in the very beginning
I explained to you. As Charles Smith said, evolution is atheism. In spite of
the scientific evidences, to keep atheism alive, they defend this Darwinism
nonsense. So, facts from paleontology, you see what was the expectation
of Darwinism. First a single cell would come into being by chance and