Page 89 - The Evolution Impasse 1

87

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FINS AND FEET

1 1 3 3

œ
n
C Cœlacanth fin
a
c
l
a
i
n
f
t
h

l
C Cœlacanth
œ
a
n
a
h
t
c
2 2 4 4
h
y
c
t
t
e
h
I Ichthyostega foot t

o
o
f
o
g
s
a
t
h
e
g
a
t
y
o
s
c
h
I Ichthyostega
o
n
h
e

i
s

t
l
u
n
s
s
t
i

h
e
i
r
t

s
a

e
n
h
o
w
n
i
y
a
T These fishes’ bony fins are the main reason why evolutionists imagined that the
o
s
a
v

m
’
o
r
e
b
y
i
e
f

m
e

a
t
i
f
n
t
d
s
t
h
e
n

e

e
g
a
s
i
h
h
a
t
f
l
e
C Coelacanth and similar fish are the ancestors of terrestrial animals. They assumed
o
s
a
e
t
e

d

n
s

n
s
a
m
o

e
s
t
s
s
l
s

i
a
l
r
a
i
a
r
h
a
r
r
o
n
t
a
a
i

m
T
l
c
h

r
y
u
e
c
d
e
m
f
r
.
e
h
i
h
t
e
n
a
s
i

i
d
ne
r
n
f
e

t
o
e
m
n
a
t
a
f

u
d
n
l
e
r
n
e
c
e
d

i
f
f
e
w
v
r
e
o
t
e
.
H

,
i

s
a

e
t

h
r
e

t
h
a
t
t
y
h
e
s
w
s
e

o

n
e
l
u
t that these bones slowly turned into feet. However, there is a fundamental difference
l

b
s
o
s

f
n

n

t
o
h
n
d
e
g
t
w
l

e
a
o
s
et
o
a
e
o
f

l
h
s
i
t
t

e
e

m
y
f
d
e
n
s
a
c
i

.
h

e
h
f
h
s
h
b between the bones of these fish and the feet of such land animals as Ichthyostega. As s
e
c
n

u
A
s

s
e
t

a
a
I
b
a
t
e
h
o

l
i
n
n
o
a
r

e

t
m

t
i
a
a
t
c
s

i
a

a
r
1
h
e
n
t

i

o
e
h
n
h

g
o
e
b
o
D
c
c
n
b
s shown in Diagram 1, the bones in the Coelacanth are not connected to its backbone. .
o
e
t
n
s
e
n

n
d
c
e
o

a
C
,

h
t
t
k
e
w
n
b
e
c

h
r
g
D
e
r
n
r
i
d
e
a
i
a
s
c
I
m

e
e
,
h
e
e
t
v
a
s
a

c
r

,

T The bones in Ichthyostega, however, as shown in Diagram 2, are directly attached to

a
h
,
o
t
a
w
h
e
d
g

o

w
l
a
i
o
o
n

i
y
n
h
t
h

t
o
s
b
t

s
2
y
t
n
t the backbone. .
k
e

b
a
b
o
c
h
e
n
i
s
,

r
n
e
u
r
o
e
s
T Therefore, the claim that these fins slowly turned into feet is totally groundless. .
s
e
d
l
h
t
a
r
e

t
o

f
g
o
l
l
y
s
i
n
e
s
d

o
f

t
n

t
i
l
y

l
r
t
a
l
u
o
i
m

w
n
e
c

f
th

s
a
e
e
t
e
h

t
t
h
e
a

t
e
m
e
F Furthermore, as can be seen from Diagrams 3 and 4, the structure of the bones in the
h
b

e
3
e
s
o
n
r
n
f
s

e
o
t
i
D

n
i

r
m

r
e
n
r
a
u
h
s
a

g
b
o
a
h
e

o
t
s
,
t
f

r
u
u
e
t
c
r
e
s

t
r
,
h

n
d
e
m
c

4
a
f
o
s
a

e
e
f
c

l
f
f
o
y

e
a
f
e
d
i
i
h
e
r

C Coelacanth fin and in the feet of Ichthyostega is completely different. .
t
d

l
y
e
i

h
t
n
e
t
s
a
a
n
p
o

m
l
t
c
e

c
h
I
n
i
g
t
t
t
o
e
h
n
n
these marine animals. There is thus no lo- Evolutionist biologists have no consis-
gical basis for suggesting that legs came tent fossil records they can point to on
about by way of natural selection. this matter.
On the contrary, any living thing un- Evolutionists generally regard fish
dergoing “pre-adaptation” should be eli- belonging to the class Rhipidistian or
minated by way of natural selection, be- Cœlacanth as the ancestors of quadru-
cause the more characteristics it deve- peds. These fish belong to the group
lops that are appropriate to dry land, the Crossopterygian. Their only features
more disadvantaged it will be in water. that inspire hope in evolutionists are the-
In short, the scenario of transition from ir fins, being fleshier than those of other
sea to land is totally self-contradictory. fish. However, these fish are not inter-
Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)