Page 82 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 82

80  OH 62: A Species of Ape



               tion, com plete ly in de pend ent mu ta - ONTOGENY
               tions must have pro duced these life RECAPITULATES
               forms twice, by chance! This fact pla - PHYLOGENY THEORY, THE
               ces ev o lu tion ists in an even worse
                                                     (See al so The, Biogenetic Law and
               di lem ma. Extraordinary sim i lar i ties
                                                   Theory of Recapitulation,)
               like these, which con flict with the
                                                     The ev o lu tion ist bi ol o gist Ernst
               ev o lu tion ist  the sis  of  ho mol o gy,
                                                   Haeckel pro posed this the o ry to -
               show that sim i lar or gans rep re sent
                                                   ward the end of the 19th cen tu ry.
               no ev i dence for hav ing evolved from
                                                   The term  re ca pit u la tion is used to
               a com mon an ces tor. Indeed, the ex -
                                                   sum ma rize the the o ry.
               act op po site can be ob served in some
                                                     Haeckel claimed that dur ing their
               life forms: Some liv ing things, de -
                                                   de vel op men tal phas es, em bry os re -
               spite be ing re gard ed by ev o lu tion -
                                                   peat ed the ev o lu tion a ry proc ess that
               ists as very close ly re lat ed, have
                                                   their al leged an ces tors had un der -
               some or gans that are com plete ly dif -
                                                   gone. For ex am ple, he main tained
               fer ent from one an oth er.
                                                   that dur ing its de vel op ment in the
                                                   moth er's womb the hu man em bryo
                                                   ex hib it ed first fish-like gills and then
               OH 62: A SPECIES OF APE
                                                   rep tile char ac ter is tics be fore fi nal ly
                  Evolutionists long sug gest ed that  "evolv ing" in to a hu man ba by.
               the fos sil crea ture to which they  However, as time passed, it emerged
               gave the name Homo ha bi lis was ca -  that this sce nar io was to tal ly im ag i -
               pa ble of walk ing up right. They thus  nary.
               thought that they had found a link    Evolutionists al so ad mit this. One
               be tween ape and man. However, the  ar ti cle in American Scientist read:
               new H. ha bi lis fos sils dis cov ered by
                                                     Surely the bi o ge net ic law [the re ca pit -
               Tim White in 1986 and giv en the
                                                     u la tion the o ry] is as dead as a door nail.
               name OH 62 de mol ished that claim.   It was fi nal ly ex or cised from bi ol o gy
               These fos sil parts showed that, just  text books in the fif ties. As a top ic of se -
               like present-day apes, H. ha bi lis had  ri ous the o ret i cal in quiry it was ex tinct
               long arms and short legs. This fos sil  in the twen ties.  75
               put an end to the claim that H. ha bi -  To sup port his the o ry of re ca pit u -
               lis was ca pa ble of walk ing up right. It  la tion, Ernst Haeckel pro duced
               was noth ing more than a spe cies of  faked draw ings, at tempt ing to por -
               ape.                                tray fish and hu man em bry os as re -

                                                               The Evolution Impasse II
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87