Page 16 - HỘI THẢO KHOA HOC 18.5.2022
P. 16
2. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and
implementation for novice re Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and
interpreting qualitative materials. London, England: Sage. searchers. The Qualitative
Report, 13, 544–559.
3. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.
London, England: Sage.
4. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2014). “Systematic combining”—A decade later. Journal of
Business Research, 67, 1277–1284.
5. Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method
in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20, 369–391.
6. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Milton Keynes, England: Open
University Press.
7. Perecman, E., & Curran, S. R. (2006). A handbook for social sciences field research: Essay
& bibliographic sources on research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and
Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20, 134–152.
9. Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the future of the case study. Method in evaluation research.
Evaluation Practice, 15, 283–290.
15
