Page 38 - June
P. 38

METALWORKING EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS

        technically stable. Oscillations corresponding to such an attractor are self-oscillations, but their
        amplitude can satisfy the requirements for technical stability.
               However, the cutting process considered in the phase space for a frequency range including
        one of the natural frequencies may correspond not to one quasi-attractor, but two. The transition
        of the cutting system from one technically stable attractor to another leads to intense self-
        oscillations. The attractor accompanying intense self-oscillations usually deviates significantly
        from the tangential direction and in the XY plane is elongated in a direction close to the normal
        to the cutting surface. It has a scope that is several times greater than the requirements for
        technical stability. Summarizing what has been said shown in Fig.5.
               In the  diagram  (Fig.5a),  attractor  1 is elongated  in the  tangential  direction, having a
        minimal effect on the increase in the surface roughness of the part due to a relatively small
        radial deflection. However, depending on the cutting resistance and the elastic properties of the
        chip to be removed, the deflection can vary. For example, if, in exactly the same conditions,
        workpieces made of aluminum alloy and marble are sharpened, then in the second case this
        deviation will be 2 - 3 times greater. In marble, shavings are obtained in the form of a fine
        powder, which cannot resist the deflection of the cutter in the radial direction [15].




















                       a                                                     b

        Fig. 5. Layout of attractors during cutting: a) 1 - attractor accompanying technically stable cutting; 2 - attractor with intense
        self-oscillations; Z - tangential direction; n - normal direction to the cutting surface in the XY plane; b) an example of a
        "rose" vibration when turning hardened steel with intense self-oscillation.

               The transition of the cutting process from attractor 1 to attractor 2 should be considered a
        technical loss of stability (Fig.5a). This is also a quasi-attractor, although it sometimes resembles
        a regular one, when the formation of its trajectories occurs with a minimum influence of the
        separated chips. In three-dimensional phase space, it can resemble the surface of a torus. In
        fig. 5a, the transition from attractor 1 to attractor 2 is marked with an arrow pointing in one
        direction. The point is that the regime of intense self-oscillations, which is embodied in the
        form of attractor 2, is energetically more favorable. Because of this, the reverse transition from
        attractor 2 to attractor 1, while maintaining all cutting conditions, is unlikely. When turning with



    38     Stanochniy park
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43