Page 225 - CRS Engineering

AI^N£XURE-II
PROFORMA FOR SUBMISSION OF RAT INSPECTION REPORTS
S.No. Description
I
I. General Particulars of R.A.T.
Name of the Tank Chennaya Gunta Tank
District Chittoor
Name of Village & Mandal ^ennaya Gunta (V) in Tirupati Urban Mandal
Latitude & Longitude - -n_ .
13"38'5S"R7q°28'14"f'^7n/fi|
Affected Railway Bridge and KM 206 &204 &137/7-8 to 139 KM
Railway section and between stations
Renigunta - Kodur
Distance from Railway bridge to bund (along tfie
course of Nalla) 8 KM to 10 KM
II. Standard Hydraulic details
Catchment area
D.95 sg.km.
Capacity of the tank
9.13 Mcft
Lowest bed level
Full tank level ( FTl '
100.000 Mts
Maximum water level I MWl ]
100.600 Mts
Danger Level ( ni
Top of Bund Level I TRl
101.800 Mts
Top width of Bund
3.00 Mts
Side slopes
Front: 11/2:1. Rear: 7-1
ea of submereiblp at FTL
0.47 sg.km.
Area of submergible at MWL
0.57 sq.Km
12 Are there any tanks in the catchment of this tar^k.
No
13 Arethese tanks also classified as a RAT
No
14 Name and details of these tanks
No
No. of surplus weirs
One
Length of surplus weirs
30.0 Mts
Type of surplus weir
B.C. Weir
4 [Design discharge
474.41 cusecs
IV. Sluice
One
170 M from Surplus weir
Maximum design discharge
Functional or not
Functional
v. A: Inspection Details
Date of Inspection
-iL3-.02-2020
Name and designation ofinspecting officials
Sri. C. Wilson babu, ADEN, S.C.Railways, Renigunta
Sri R.M.V.Ramana Murthy, Asst.Engineer, Irrigation
Section, Tirupati Urban
If thequality for classification as RAT
Yes
B: Tank bund
Is thetop level ofthebund uniformed and asas
per the standards No
Is thetopwidth ofthebund asper standards
Yes
Arethe slopes as per the standards Yes
Any dangerous gullies orscoured the bund
No
C; Surplus weir
Condition Good
Is the length adfequate for design discharge
Yes
Is danger level marked
No
D:Condition of the sluice
working
E:Any past history ofbreach ofthe tank and ifso,
No
details

signA^iS FANI
Assistant
i;?w»wriafijiSECTio7>j'
5.31.S.C.Railway tirupathi urban
I Renigunta