Page 289 - CRS Engineering
P. 289

Annexure II
                                   PROFORMA FOR SUBMISSION OF R.A.T INSPECTION REPORTS
                 S.NO.                 Description                                Remarks
                   I  General particulars of RAT
                   1  Name of the tank                         RAMAUNGA SAMUDRAM CHERUVU
                      Tank ID                                  CHCT0028000PAl<
                   2  District                                 CHnTGOR
                   3   Name of village & Mandal                Chinthapenta (V) Penumur Mandal
                   4  Latitude & Longitude                     13° 22' 45"  & 79° 14' 15"
                   5  Afficted Railway Bridge & KM             616 KM 48/8-9
                   6  Railway section and between stations     SSE PW CrO PTT-PAK
                      Distance from Railway bridge to weir (along the course of
                       Nallah)                                 7.4 KM
                   7
                      Standard Hydraulic Details
                   11
                      Catchment Area                           11.32 Sq.Miles
                   1
                      Capacityof the Tank                      27.77Mcft
                   2
                   3  Lowest Bed Level                         + 338.17 M
                   4  Full Tank Level (FTL)                    + 342.14 M
                      Maximum water level (MWL)                + 342.90 M
                   5
                   6  Danqer Level (DL)
                   7  Top of Bund Level (TBL)                  + 344.12 M
                   8  Top width of Bund                        1.50 M
                   9  Side slopes                              Front 1.5:1  Rear 2:1
                  10  Area of submergence at FTL               6.40 M.Sq.feet 0.595 M.Sq.M
                  11  Area of submergence at MWL
                  12  Are there any tanks in the catchment of these tank ?  yes
                      Are these tanks also classifed as RATs'?
                   13                                          yes
                   14  Names & Details of these tanks          15N0S
                  III  Surplus weir
                   1   No. of surplus weirs                    INos.
                   2   Lengths of surplus weirs                52.73 M +8.38 M
                   3  Types of surplus weirs                   Masonry weir + Rockev ground escape
                   4   Design Discharge                        2521 Cft./Sec. or 71.39CUM/Sec
                   IV  Sluice
                   1   No. of Sluices                          3Nos
                   2   Location of Sluices                     L/sR/s
                   3   Maximum Design Discharge
                   4   Functional or Not                       functioned
                   V  A. Inspection Detailes
                      i) Date of inspection                    22.2.20
                                                               l.Sri D.S.Rajendra Prasad , DEE,ISD,G.D.Nellore@Chittoor,
                      ii) Name &Designation of                 2.Sri K.Bhaskar Reddy,AE,Irrigation section,Penumuru.,
                      InspectingOfficials                      3.Sri M.N.Krishnappa ,ADEN/Pakala,  4.Sri.V.Dhamu
                                                               Raju SSE/P.WAY/Chittoor
                      lii) If the tank quaiiry tor   classitication
                      as RAT                                   Yes
                       B.Tank Bund
                      i) IstheToplevel oftheBund
                       uniform and as per the standards        yes
                      il) Is theTopwidth ofthe Bund as perthe standards  Yes
                      iii) Are theslopes as perthestandards    yes
                      iv)AnyDangerous gulliesor
                      scoure of the Bund                       No.
                      C. Surplus Weir                          Work In Progress
                      i) Condtion
                      ii) Is the length adquate for  Design Discharge
                      iii) Is Danger Level Marked ?
                                                               fgjj.                     /\SGlCtCini UAWUUU i.
                      D.Condition of the Sluices
                                                                                         IRRlCAl ION       riON
                      E. Any Past History of Breach of the Tankand ifso, details No.       \PFNUW1UR
                Remarks ; Work in Progress
                                                                                           4_


                             Signature with Name &Designation         Signaturewith Name&Desig<?^i—
                                                                             of Irrigation Official
                                                                     DEPUTY EXEGyiE¥£ Ef^GmSEa
                               Asst. r.ivl. L'ngineer               (RRIGN. SUB"DiVlN. G.D.NELLORE @
                                      / S.C. Railway                          CHITTOOR.
                                       TiRUPfTI
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294