Page 358 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat
P. 358

◾	 Removing dissatisfying characteristics from a job didn’t                      Olly/Fotolia
                                    necessarily make that job more satisfying (or motivating);
                                    it simply made you “less” dissatisfied.

                                 ◾	 Proposed a dual continuum: The opposite of “satisfaction”
                                    is “no satisfaction,” and the opposite of “dissatisfaction”
                                    is “no dissatisfaction.”

                            Motivating Employees:

                             1   When hygiene factors are adequate, people won’t be
                                 dissatisfied, but they won’t be motivated, either.
                                2  To motivate people, use the motivators.



                       4          Mcclelland’s Three-Needs Theory








                            •  David McClelland and his associates proposed the three-needs theory, which
                           1 2 3
                                                                                                                  11
                                says three acquired (not innate) needs are major motives in work, including:


                                need for achievement (nAch),
                                                                                                 need for affiliation (nAff),

                                                                  need for power (nPow),
                                                                  which is the need to make others
                                                                                                 which is the desire for friendly and
                                which is the drive to succeed and
                                                                  behave in a way that they would
                                excel in relation to a set of standards
                                                                                                 close interpersonal relationships
                                                                  not have behaved otherwise
                            •  nAch has been researched the most:
                                ◾	 People with a high nAch are striving for personal achievement rather than for the trappings and
                                   rewards of success.
                                ◾	 They have a desire to do something better or more efficiently than it’s been done before. 12

                                ◾	 They prefer ❶ jobs that offer personal responsibility for finding solutions to problems, ❷ receiving
                                   rapid and unambiguous feedback on their performance in order to tell whether they’re improving,
                                   and ❸ moderately challenging goals.
                                ◾	 High achievers avoid what they perceive to be very easy or very difficult tasks.

                                ◾	 A high nAch doesn’t necessarily lead to being a good manager, especially in large organizations.
                                   Why? Because high achievers focus on their own accomplishments, while good managers
                                   emphasize helping others accomplish their goals. 13
                                ◾	 Employees can be trained to stimulate their nAch by being in situations where they have personal
                                   responsibility, feedback, and moderate risks. 14
                            •  The best managers tend to be high in nPow and low in nAff.        15


                       need for achievement (nAch)     need for power (nPow)         need for affiliation (nAff)
                       The drive to succeed and excel in relation to a set of   The need to make others behave in a way that they   The desire for friendly and close interpersonal
                       standards                       would not have behaved otherwise  relationships

                                                                                                                        357
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363