Page 379 - Fundamentals of Management Myths Debunked (2017)_Flat

378 Part 4 • Leading
Endnotes

1. P. Bronson, “What Should I Do ior and Human Performance, April for the Twenty-First Century,” “Effects of Task Complexity and
with My Life Now?” Fast Com- 1972, 265–87; and D. T. Hall and Academy of Management Review, Learning Stage on the Relation-
pany, April 2009, 35–37. K. E. Nongaim, “An Examination July 2004, 388–403; and M. L. ship between Participation in Goal
2. SmartPulse, “How Well Do You of Maslow’s Need Hierarchy in an Ambrose and C. T. Kulik, “Old Setting and Task Performance,”
Motivate Your People?” Smart Organizational Setting,” Organiza- Friends, New Faces: Motivation Academy of Management Pro-
Brief on Leadership, www tional Behavior and Human Per- Research in the 1990s.” ceedings on Disk, 1996; T. D.
.smartbrief.com/leadership, Janu- formance, February 1968, 12–35. 18. M. L. Ambrose and C. T. Kulik, Ludwig and E. S. Geller, “As-
ary 20, 2015. 9. R. E. Kopelman, D. J. Prottas, “Old Friends, New Faces: Motiva- signed versus Participative Goal
3. R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday, and and A. L. Davis, “Douglas Mc- tion Research in the 1990s.” Setting and Response Generaliza-
D. L. Shapiro, “The Future of Gregor’s Theory X and Y: Toward 19. J. C. Naylor and D. R. Ilgen, “Goal tion: Managing Injury Control
Work Motivation Theory,” Acad- a Construct-Valid Measure,” Jour- Setting: A Theoretical Analysis among Professional Pizza Deliver-
emy of Management Review, July nal of Managerial Issues (Summer of a Motivational Technique,” in ers,” Journal of Applied Psychol-
2004, 379–87. 2008): 255–71; and D. McGregor, B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings ogy (April 1997): 253–61; and S.
4. A. Adkins, “U.S. Employee The Human Side of Enterprise (eds.), Research in Organizational G. Harkins and M. D. Lowe, “The
Engagement Holds Steady at (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960). Behavior, vol. 6 (Greenwich, CT: Effects of Self-Set Goals on Task
31.7%,” http://www.gallup For an updated description of JAI Press, 1984), 95–140; A. R. Performance,” Journal of Applied
.com/poll/183041/employee- Theories X and Y, see an annotated Pell, “Energize Your People,” Social Psychology (January 2000):
engagement-holds-steady.aspx, edition with commentary of The Managers Magazine, December 1–40.
May 7, 2015. Human Side of Enterprise (Mc- 1992, 28–29; E. A. Locke, “Facts 21. J. M. Ivancevich and J. T.
5. J. Krueger and E. Killham, “At Graw-Hill, 2006); and G. Heil, W. and Fallacies about Goal Theory: McMahon, “The Effects of Goal
Work, Feeling Good Matters,” Bennis, and D. C. Stephens, Doug- Reply to Deci,” Psychological Sci- Setting, External Feedback, and
Gallup Management Journal, las McGregor, Revisited: Manag- ence, January 1993, 63–64; M. E. Self-Generated Feedback on Out-
http://gmj.gallup.com (December ing the Human Side of Enterprise Tubbs, “Commitment as a Mod- come Variables: A Field Experi-
8, 2005). (New York: Wiley, 2000). erator of the Goal-Performance ment,” Academy of Management
6. “Maslow Motion,” New States- 10. F. Herzberg, B. Mausner, and B. Relation: A Case for Clearer Journal (June 1982): 359–72; and
man, March 15, 2010, 37; “Dia- Snyderman, The Motivation to Construct Definition,” Journal E. A. Locke, “Motivation Through
logue,” Academy of Management Work (New York: John Wiley, of Applied Psychology (Febru- Conscious Goal Setting.”
Review, October 2000, 696–701; 1959); F. Herzberg, The Manage- ary 1993): 86–97; M. P. Colling- 22. J. R. Hollenbeck, C. R. Williams,
M. L. Ambrose and C. T. Kulik, rial Choice: To Be Effective or wood, “Why Don’t You Use the and H. J. Klein, “An Empirical
“Old Friends, New Faces: Mo- to Be Human, rev. ed. (Salt Lake Research?” Management Deci- Examination of the Antecedents of
tivation Research in the 1990s,” City: Olympus, 1982); R. M. sion, May 1993, 48–54; M. E. Commitment to Difficult Goals,”
Journal of Management 25, no. 3 Creech, “Employee Motivation”; Tubbs, D. M. Boehne, and J. S. Journal of Applied Psychology
(1999): 231–92; A. Maslow, D. C. and M. L. Ambrose and C. T. Ku- Dahl, “Expectancy, Valence, and (February 1989): 18–23; see, also,
Stephens, and G. Heil, Maslow on lik, “Old Friends, New Faces: Mo- Motivational Force Functions in J. C. Wofford, V. L. Goodwin, and
Management (New York: John Wi- tivation Research in the 1990s.” Goal-Setting Research: An Em- S. Premack, “Meta-Analysis of
ley & Sons, 1998); and A. Maslow, 11. D. C. McClelland, The Achieving pirical Test,” Journal of Applied the Antecedents of Personal Goal
Motivation and Personality (New Society (New York: Van Nostrand Psychology (June 1993): 361–73; Level and of the Antecedents and
York: McGraw-Hill, 1954). Reinhold, 1961); J. W. Atkinson E. A. Locke, “Motivation Through Consequences of Goal Commit-
7. R. Coutts, “A Pilot Study for the and J. O. Raynor, Motivation and Conscious Goal Setting,” Applied ment,” Journal of Management
Analysis of Dream Reports Using Achievement (Washington, DC: and Preventive Psychology, vol. 5 (September 1992): 595–615;
Maslow’s Need Categories: An Winston, 1974); D. C. McClel- (1996): 117–24; M. L. Ambrose Tubbs, “Commitment as a Mod-
Extension to the Emotional Selec- land, Power: The Inner Experi- and C. T. Kulik, “Old Friends, erator of the Goal-Performance
tion Hypothesis,” Psychological ence (New York: Irvington, 1975); New Faces: Motivation Research Relation”; J. W. Smither, M.
Reports, October 2010, 659–73; E. and M. J. Stahl, Managerial and in the 1990s; E. A. Locke and G. London, and R. R. Reilly, “Does
A. Fisher, “Motivation and Leader- Technical Motivation: Assessing P. Latham, “Building a Practically Performance Improve Following
ship in Social Work Management: Needs for Achievement, Power, Useful Theory of Goal Setting Multisource Feedback? A Theo-
A Review of Theories and Related and Affiliation (New York: Prae- and Task Motivation: A 35-Year retical Model, Meta-Analysis, and
Studies,” Administration in Social ger, 1986). Odyssey,” American Psycholo- Review of Empirical Findings,”
Work, October–December 2009, 12. McClelland, The Achieving Society. gist, September 2002, 705–17; Personnel Psychology, Spring
347–67; and N. K. Austin, “The 13. McClelland, Power: The Inner Ex- Y. Fried and L. H. Slowik, “En- 2005, 171–203.
Power of the Pyramid: The Foun- perience; D. C. McClelland and D. riching Goal-Setting Theory with 23. M. E. Gist, “Self-Efficacy: Impli-
dation of Human Psychology and, H. Burnham, “Power Is the Great Time: An Integrated Approach,” cations for Organizational Behav-
Thereby, of Motivation, Maslow’s Motivator,” Harvard Business Re- Academy of Management Review, ior and Human Resource Manage-
Hierarchy Is One Powerful Pyra- view, March–April 1976, 100–10. July 2004, 404–22; G. P. Latham, ment,” Academy of Management
mid,” Incentive (July 2002): 10. 14. D. Miron and D. C. McClelland, “The Motivational Benefits of Review, July 1987, 472–85; and A.
8. See, for example, M. L. Ambrose “The Impact of Achievement Mo- Goal-Setting,” Academy of Man- Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exer-
and C. T. Kulik, “Old Friends, tivation Training on Small Busi- agement Executive, November cise of Control (New York: Free-
New Faces: Motivation Research nesses,” California Management 2004, 126–29; and G. Yeo, S. Loft, man, 1997).
in the 1990s”; J. Rowan, “Ascent Review, Summer 1979, 13–28. T. Xiao, and C. Kiewitz, “Goal 24. E. A. Locke, E. Frederick, C. Lee,
and Descent in Maslow’s Theory,” 15. “McClelland: An Advocate of Orientation and Performance: and P. Bobko, “Effect of Self-
Journal of Humanistic Psychol- Power,” International Manage- Differential Relationships Across Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strate-
ogy (Summer 1999): 125–33; ment, July 1975, 27–29. Levels of Analysis and as a Func- gies on Task Performance,” Jour-
J. Rowan, “Maslow Amended,” 16. J. Flint, “How to Be a Player,” tion of Task Demands,” Journal of nal of Applied Psychology (May
Journal of Humanistic Psychol- Bloomberg BusinessWeek, January Applied Psychology (May 2009): 1984): 241–51; M. E. Gist and
ogy (Winter 1998): 81–92; R. M. 24–30, 2011, 108–09. 710–26. T. R. Mitchell, “Self-Efficacy: A
Creech, “Employee Motivation,” 17. R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday, and 20. J. A. Wagner III, “Participation’s Theoretical Analysis of Its Deter-
Management Quarterly, Summer D. L. Shapiro, “The Future of Effects on Performance and Sat- minants and Malleability,” Acad-
1995, 33–39; E. E. Lawler III and Work Motivation Theory”; E. A. isfaction: A Reconsideration of emy of Management Review, April
J. L. Suttle, “A Causal Correla- Locke and G. P. Latham, “What Research and Evidence,” Acad- 1992, 183–211; A. D. Stajkovic
tional Test of the Need Hierarchy Should We Do about Motivation emy of Management Review, April and F. Luthans, “Self-Efficacy
Concept,” Organizational Behav- Theory? Six Recommendations 1994, 312–30; J. George-Falvey, and Work-Related Performance: