Page 290 - SEC_2017WorkingDocument_Neat
P. 290

29.     Professor  Harris  enquired  what  “psychometrically  robust”  meant  in  terms  of
               reducing the number of questions.  The Registrar explained that when an examination paper
               offers optional questions it meant that the candidates questions must have the same scope,
               demands and issues.  Unfortunately, over the years there have been no examination board
               able to make those factors equivalent in each question.  As a result, scores on those questions
               sometimes differ significantly.  Examination administrators have begun to tests skills set in
               content areas which makes it more logical to give one question.  The CXC is trying to ensure
               that the organization offers a test that is done by all on the construct of a particular subject
               area and that there was no wavering.

               30.     Mr Seecharan informed the SUBSEC that there was validity to restricting options and
               limiting choices.  He however cautioned that the CXC needs to ensure that the sampling of
               the domain that was being tested was appropriate and there was not an entire question
               testing a narrow objective.  Mr Seecharan also asked that, against the background of what
               occurred in 2017 regarding the SBA, CXC provides a summarized clear explanation of the
               requirements for submission of the SBA.

               31.     The SUBSEC considered the contents of the reports as well as arguments presented
               and approved the final drafts of the CAPE® Biology, Chemistry and Physics syllabuses and
               specimen  examination  papers  effective  for  teaching  from  September  2018  and  for
               examinations in May–June 2019.

               The Report on the Meetings to complete the revision of the Law Syllabus

               32.     Members received the report on the meetings to complete the revision of the Law
               Syllabus and noted the timeline from first publication to revision.  Proposed amendments to
               the  syllabus  included  a  revision  of  the  SBA  guidelines  to  assist  teachers  with  using  the
               information to guide candidates to demonstrate relevant competencies, skills and abilities
               identified in the syllabus.   The SUBSEC heard that the assessment comprised Paper 01 –
               forty-five multiple choice items, Paper 02 - three compulsory extended-response questions
               and Paper 03 - A Research paper.  The SUBSEC also heard that Subject Matter Expert, Mr
               Haimchan Ramedo, Education Manager, ACCA Caribbean stated that, “when mapped against
               professional programmes and certifications awarded by the ACCA, the syllabus was found to
               contain common elements.”

               33.     The SUBSEC noted the comments and proposed changes and approved the final draft
               of the CAPE® Law Syllabus as well as specimen examination papers effective for teaching
               from September 2018 and for examinations from May–June 2019.













                                                                                                   8 | P a g e
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295