Page 44 - JulAug2019_BarJournal
P. 44

COLUMN ETHICS PERSPECTIVES






                                            HAND IT OVER






                                            THE ETHICS OF TURNING OVER THE CLIENT
                                            FILE UPON TERMINATION OR WITHDRAWAL




                                                                                             Shane Lawson





                  he attorney-client relationship   obtain the client file is absolute. As succinctly   includes additional language stating that
                  can  come  to an  early  end for   stated by the Supreme Court of Ohio: “an   “‘[c]lient papers and property’ may include
                  a variety of reasons. Examples   attorney who is discharged must yield the   correspondence,  pleadings,  deposition
                  include the development of a   case file.” Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik &   transcripts, exhibits, physical evidence,
        Tconflict, client dissatisfaction   Webster v. Lansberry, 68 Ohio St.3d 570, 574,   expert reports, and other items reasonably
        with the lawyer’s services, or the client’s failure   629 N.E.2d 431 (1994).   necessary to the client’s representation.”
        to  pay  fees  and  expenses.  Regardless  of  the   The requirement is confirmed in Ohio   Prof.Cond.R.  1.16(d).  Other  materials
        reasons resulting in the conclusion of the   Rule of Professional Conduct 1.16, which   generally considered to be “reasonably
        representation, however, the client’s right to   requires an attorney upon the termination   necessary to the client’s representation”
                                            of representation to “take steps, to the   include all documents initially provided
                                            extent reasonably practicable, to protect a   by the client, court filings and orders,
                                            client’s interest” — specifically including   discovery and evidentiary materials, and
                                            by “delivering to the client all papers and   third-party investigatory reports or records
                                            property to which the client is entitled.”   paid for by the client.  See  Ohio Advisory
                                            Prof.Cond.R. 1.16(d);  see also  Prof.  Opinion 92-8 (interpreting predecessor to
                                            Cond.R. 1.4(a)(4) (requiring lawyer to   Rule 1.16); ABA Formal Opinion 471 at 2,
                                            promptly comply with a client’s request for   4. Drafts of yet unfiled briefs or motions,
                                            information). While the mandate to provide   along with relevant research, may also be
                                            the client file is clear, whether certain   deemed reasonably necessary to the client’s
                                            materials are to be considered part of that   representation — and thus part of the client
                                            file, or may be excluded from production,   file — especially if the provision of those
                                            will often require the exercise of the   documents are necessary to protect the
                                            attorney’s professional judgment.   client’s interest moving forward (e.g. due to
                                                                               an impending filing deadline or the cost the
                                            Determining what constitutes the   client would incur to have successor counsel
                                            client file.                       re-create  the  work).  See  ABA  Formal
                                            As a threshold matter, what materials   Opinion 471 at 4.
                                            the client is entitled to receive upon   Whether a client is entitled to a lawyer’s
                                            termination varies by state. ABA Model   notes  and  internal  memoranda  after
            OVER 25 YEARS OF                Rule 1.16 does not specifically delineate   termination  is  dependent  on  whether  those
            PERSONAL INJURY,                the  “papers and  property to  which the   materials are reasonably necessary to the
            MEDICAL MALPRACTICE,            client is entitled,” and jurisdictions have   client’s representation. That issue is addressed
            AND AUTO / TRUCKING             interpreted the requirement in different   in Ohio Advisory Opinion 2010-2, which
            CASES                           ways. Some  states take an “entire  file”   states in pertinent part:
                                            approach with limited exceptions, while   A lawyer’s notes to himself or herself
            216.223.7535                    others have implemented an “end product”   regarding passing thoughts, ideas,
                                                                                 impression, or questions will probably
                                            approach.  See, e.g.,  ABA Formal Opinion
            ROBENALTLAW.COM                 471 (discussing different approaches).   not be items reasonably necessary
                                                                                 to a client’s representation. Internal
                                              In  Ohio,  initial  guidance  is  provided
                                            by Ohio’s version of Rule 1.16, which   office management memoranda such
      44 |  CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR JOURNAL                                                    CLEMETROBAR.ORG
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49