Page 24 - China, 5000 years : innovation and transformation in the arts
P. 24
unprecedented primacy to three-dimensional work, struggle that is reflected in its attempt to bridge tra-
particularly to Buddhist sculpture. ditional Chinese attitudes with the inevitable con-
sequences of contemporary politics and expanding
These, then, are the great formative themes of contact with the West.
China: 5,000 Years, which emerged as a result of
Professor Lee's numerous trips to China over the The late nineteenth to early twentieth centuries
past four years. During these visits, he traveled
brought a certain cultural cross-fertilization
throughout the country to provincial museums and between China and Europe. Just as European artists
were influenced by Asian block-printing tech-
archaeological excavations, as well as to the great niques, perspectival flatness, and decorative tenden-
cies, for example, Chinese artists were drawn to
collections in Beijing and Shanghai. He searched Western approaches, methodologies, and tech-
niques, such as Impressionism, abstraction, realistic
through warehouses of recently excavated material
and considered well-known objects currently on portraiture, and oil painting. The late nineteenth
century in China saw innovations within the tradi-
display. The selection of objects he made for this tional context, which developed under the patron-
exhibition reflects his personal vision, and it has a age of Shanghai's new economic elite. Highlights
freshness and a breathtaking elegance that will
make scholars and laymen alike feel that they are included elaborate works with bird and flower
themes, and paintings based on fantastic narratives,
seeing Chinese art for the first time. Professor Lee's
vision has been supported by an impressive array of which appealed to a new class of collectors in this
international scholars, who have provided assistance vibrant industrial port city. Chinese art of the early
part of the twentieth century reflected the growing
and consultation on every aspect of the project,
including Helmut Brinker, James Cahill, Regina cosmopolitan attitude of Chinese artists, many of
Krahl, Howard Rogers, and Jenny So, who rendered whom studied abroad. The 1920s saw a re-
continuous support and advice on all aspects of the emergence of the woodcut as a powerful artistic
exhibition as it was being planned and on the medium, as art became swept up in the social and
structure and rhythm of the installation at the political upheavals that were coursing through
China. The inherently stark contrast and imminent
Guggenheim Museum. On the Chinese side, Zhang reproducibility of woodcuts made this a natural
medium for communicating the horrific realities of
Wenbin, Director General of the National the Japanese invasion, and the numerous prints
reflecting the horrors of war from this period recall
Administration for Cultural Heritage, and Wang the graphic work of Francisco de Goya in their
shocking impact. Postwar communism brought a
Limei, Director of the Foreign Affairs Office of the socialist-realist format that produced some of the
National Administration for Cultural Heritage, most outstanding examples of realist painting ever
structured the lengthy discussions and negotiations seen. Although Chinese socialist realism was not
considered by most Western critics, there is no
with the various museums and archaeological exca- doubt that painterly technique flourished in the
Chinese academy at a level of extraordinary sophis-
vations that have lent objects to the exhibition. tication, and this laid the foundation for a rejuvena-
tion of Chinese art during the past two decades
They also provided invaluable advice, as did the through a blending of traditional, academic, and
international influences. In short, the art of China
directors of the Palace Museum in Beijing and the in the twentieth century tells a compelling story,
Shanghai Museum, Yang Xin, Ma Chengyuan, and which demands to be considered in the context of
Wang Qingzheng, who not only made their collec- the long train of Chinese art history, and in the
context of an emerging global sensibility.
tions available, but often suggested improvements to
the checklist that went beyond our expectations. In The Guggenheim has been again fortunate in
short, the traditional section of China: 5,oooYears is attracting a first-rate team of scholars to organize
a visionary and collaborative enterprise of unprece- this narrative of modern Chinese art, under the
dented proportion between Chinese, American, and leadership and direction of Professor Julia Andrews
of The Ohio State University, one of the world's
international scholars.
leading scholars of twentieth-century Chinese art.
The modern section of China: 5,000 Years has no Professor Andrews has been ably assisted in her
less an engaging history. As China has modernized selection by contributions from Kuiyi Shen,
and gradually become more accessible to the
Presidential Fellow, The Ohio State University;
Western world during the past 150 years, so too has
its visual culture, but the country's most recent cul- Jonathan Spence, Sterling Professor of History,
tural production has been largely ignored by a Yale University; Shan Guolin, Chief Curator of
Western sensibility dominated almost exclusively by
a Modernist Western canon. The turbulent political
and social context in which twentieth-century
Chinese art has developed, however, is no reason to
separate it from the larger history of Chinese art
from which it derives much of its inspiration, or
from the Western traditions that it also reflects. Its
particular fascination will not be found in the
degree to which it participated in the development
of a Euro-American Modernism, but rather in the
INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 22