Page 115 - Jindezhen Porcelain Production of the 19th C. by Ellen Huang, Univ. San Diego 2008
P. 115

98



                                                   39
                       and buy (gou ᒅ) [porcelain].”   This collector went by the pen name, Ban Chizi̒ຎɿ.

                       He did not contextualize the book or state his reasons for penning a four-part manuscript on

                       ceramics in the discourse of nation or history.  For Ban Chizi, the Jingdezhen Tao lu was


                       knowledge, but it was knowledge simply about ceramics: the book served mainly as a

                       reference guide for connoisseurship.  After locating his own text in the same category of Tao


                       lu and noting that they shared the same purposes, Ban Chizi revealed that he “recorded the

                       objects of each province’s kilns, styles, and glazes for convenience of porcelain


                                                                              40
                       identification by those who discuss and buy old porcelain.”



                       III. International Circulation and Foreign Appropriation of Jingdezhen Tao lu

                              To circumscribe the story of Tao lu’s transmission and publication history within the


                       borders of the nineteenth-century Qing state would overlook the perambulatory nature of

                       canon formation.  The idea of “Chinese art” as a verifiable field of study, within which

                       porcelain constituted a primary object, involved a cross-cultural and supra-national history.


                       In fact, the process of Tao lu’s canonization into national art history encompassed a journey

                       of global scope.  In this sense, concepts of Chinese art and porcelain aesthetics that came to


                       the fore in the early twentieth century cannot be attributed to an isolated phenomenon of

                       national development in which an idea or essence expressed itself in the form of a concrete,


                                     41
                       national polity.   As scores of students studying in Japan during the period of the Xinzheng
                       reforms (1902-1911) brought tides of intellectual change back to their home country, so too


                       did their activities, learning, and institutions of education, publishing, and translation affect

                       conceptual transformations.  For instance, the new aesthetic and social category of fine arts


                       referred to as “bijutsu ߕஔ” developed only in the 1890s as a result of institution-building
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120