Page 33 - Exhibit No. 13 Merit System and Promotion Plan

31

8. All faculty members considered for promotion will be evaluated based on the guidelines
and factors prescribed under NBC 461 CCE and/or other issuances for faculty
evaluation.

9. Factors to be considered shall be the following:

a. Qualifications

a.1 Education – shall refer to the relevant highest academic degree earned within the rating
period.
a.2 Experience – shall refer to academic and related professional experience/s acquired
within the rating period.
a.3 Professional Development, Achievements and Honors – shall refer to Item 3.0 in the
PASUC Common Criteria for Evaluation under NBC 461.

b. Performance

b.1 The performance of the faculty for one (1) rating period immediately preceding the
evaluation.

b.2 In the case of faculty members who went on study leave, sabbatical, maternity leave,
vacation or sick leave and the like, the last rating period immediately prior to their leaves
will be used either if they have just returned or are still on leave during the time of
evaluation for promotion.

The evaluation instruments to be used in the promotion shall be the following:

a. Qualifications – the PASUC Common Criteria for Evaluation (CCE) under NBC 461

with strict observance of the point limits in applicable items like education,

experience, trainings, seminars, expert services, etc.

b. Performance – the average of performance for one rating period using:

b.1 QCE under NBC 461 – 50% of the quantitative rating (not the adjective rating)
will be considered;

b.2 IPCR – 50% of the numerical (not the adjective) rating transmuted to 100% by
multiplying it by 10; and

b.3 Only those with at least Very Satisfactory performance rating will be considered
for promotion.