Page 34 - Exhibit No. 13 Merit System and Promotion Plan

32

c. Example of computation

c.1 Evaluated Points for Qualification - 131.28

c.2 Performance Rating
a. QCE - 89.75%
b. PES – 8.53 x 10 - 85.30%
c. Average Performance – 89.75 (QCE) + 85.30 (PES) 87.53
2

c.3 Total Points

131.28 (Qualification) x 70% = 91.90
87.53 (Performance) x 30% = 26.26

10. Consistent with one of the provisions of the ISU-BOR Resolution No. 37, s. 1998, Chain
Promotion will be done by Campus where the vacancy/ies occur/s. In case there is no
qualified faculty in the campus where there is vacancy due to the minimum educational
qualification prescribed in accordance with the QS, an inter-campus transfer of vacant
item/s may be allowed. However, such transferred vacant item will be replaced by an item
(e.g., Professor 3 for non-Ph.D. and Assistant Professor I for non-masteral) that can be filled
up by a deserving faculty in the campus where the original vacancy comes from.

The University HRMO will determine which campus will be most qualified to receive
the transferred vacant higher item for as long as that campus has the needed replacement item
and has the best qualified faculty who can assume the transferred vacant item.

11. For upgrading of rank, the criteria and procedures for evaluation provided in the
National Budget Circular pertaining to compensation classification plan for faculty
positions in the University shall be followed.

MECHANICS/PROCEDURES

1. The HRMO or a duly authorized representative of the University, upon approval of the
President, shall cause the publication and posting of all vacant positions or ranks to be filled.

The CFSPC shall review the candidates’ credentials or documents submitted to it by the
HRMO or its duly authorized representative, and submit a comprehensive evaluation
report of candidates screened for promotion to the President, through the UHRMPSB,
informing the candidates of the results of the evaluation through the HRMO.