Page 125 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 125

The validity test criteria that are considered good based on the


                                   Aiken Value method (Aiken, 1985) are:

                                   Low Validity (VR) CVI < 0.4

                                   Medium Validity (VS) 0.4 CVI < 0.8


                                   High Validity (VT) CVI 0.8


                                              Then,  the  researcher  carried  out  a  reliability  test  of  the

                                   instrument using the Rasch Measurement with the help of the Winsteps

                                   and Facets application to see reliability by observing person reliability


                                   and  item  reliability  with  Cronbach's  Alpha  criteria  (measuring

                                   reliability,  namely  assessing  the  interaction  of  person  and  item  as  a


                                   whole)

                                   Table 4. Reliability Criteria of Alpha Cronbach


                                                                                   Category
                                                     < 0.80                        Excellent
                                                     0.7 – 0.8                     Good
                                                     0.6 – 0.7                     Acceptable
                                                     0.5 – 0.6                     Poor
                                                     < 0.5                         Unacceptable



                                   At the same time, she analyzed the consistency of respondents and the

                                   quality  of  instrument  items  to  consider  measuring  reliability  using


                                   person  reliability  values  and  item  reliability  with  Rasch  modeling

                                   (Sumintono  and  Widhiarso,  2014,  p.85)..  Lastly,  Andrich  Threshold


                                   was applied to analyze whether the description of each scale is clear and

                                   understood by the respondents.








                                                              120
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130