Page 58 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 58

with  self-assessment  based  on  the  teacher-designed  goal,  the  goal+


                                   group has an extra feature, namely a strategy list, to assist students in

                                   making  adjustments  based  on  the  objective.  He  discovered  that  the

                                   goal+ group improved the most out of the three groups. He claims  "goal


                                   setting can be a helpful tool for learners in an AfL-oriented classroom


                                   when instruction and practice are repeated, and scaffolds are provided

                                   concurrently (p. 363)”.

                                         In another study, Jamalinesari et al. (2015) examined teachers'


                                   feedback in the writing course in Iran. They employed an experimental

                                   class  where  a  group  received  teacher-written  direct  feedback,  and


                                   another  received  indirect  feedback  after  a  writing  assignment.  The

                                   feedback was focused on the language used. The teacher-written direct


                                   was  operationalized by  underlying the  students'  language errors and

                                   providing corrections, whereas the indirect feedback was only provided

                                   by  underlining  the  errors.  They  found  that  the  class  with  indirect


                                   feedback improved better than that with direct feedback. However, they

                                   did not explain in their article why teacher-indirect feedback affects


                                   student writing accuracy.

                                         Additionally, Ghaffar et al. (2020) investigated the impact of AfL


                                   and jointly created rubrics on students' writing abilities and attitudes.

                                   Their study's findings suggested that the intervention group's writing


                                   had improved. A further claim by the authors is that "the students in

                                   this study began to understand the assessment criteria in the rubrics and






                                                              53
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63