Page 58 - BUKU SYNOPSIS
P. 58
with self-assessment based on the teacher-designed goal, the goal+
group has an extra feature, namely a strategy list, to assist students in
making adjustments based on the objective. He discovered that the
goal+ group improved the most out of the three groups. He claims "goal
setting can be a helpful tool for learners in an AfL-oriented classroom
when instruction and practice are repeated, and scaffolds are provided
concurrently (p. 363)”.
In another study, Jamalinesari et al. (2015) examined teachers'
feedback in the writing course in Iran. They employed an experimental
class where a group received teacher-written direct feedback, and
another received indirect feedback after a writing assignment. The
feedback was focused on the language used. The teacher-written direct
was operationalized by underlying the students' language errors and
providing corrections, whereas the indirect feedback was only provided
by underlining the errors. They found that the class with indirect
feedback improved better than that with direct feedback. However, they
did not explain in their article why teacher-indirect feedback affects
student writing accuracy.
Additionally, Ghaffar et al. (2020) investigated the impact of AfL
and jointly created rubrics on students' writing abilities and attitudes.
Their study's findings suggested that the intervention group's writing
had improved. A further claim by the authors is that "the students in
this study began to understand the assessment criteria in the rubrics and
53