Page 274 - Q23 - รวมผลงานทางวิชาการของอาจารย์ธานินทร์ เล่มที่ 1 สมบูรณ์

√«¡º≈ß“π∑“ß«‘™“°“√¢Õß»“ μ√“®“√¬å∏“π‘π∑√å °√—¬«‘‡™’¬√ 253

(Û)
‡¥’¬«°—π°Á‰¡à¡’Õ–‰√®–¬“°‡¬Áπ‡¢Á≠„®‡∑à“°—∫°“√μ’§«“¡°ÆÀ¡“¬∑’ˇªìπÕ¬Ÿà„π¢≥–π’È.
∑à“πºŸâæ‘æ“°…“∑’ˇªìπ°√√¡“∏‘°“√√à“ß°ÆÀ¡“¬Õ’°∑à“πÀπ÷Ëߪ√“√¿«à“, ·¡â«à“°ÆÀ¡“¬®–

∫—≠≠—쑉«âßà“¬Ê, ·μà∫“ߧπ°Á欓¬“¡À“™àÕß∑“ß∑’Ë®–‡¢â“„®º‘¥„À≥â, ©–π—Èπ°“√√à“ß
°ÆÀ¡“¬π—Èπ®–√à“ß„À⺟â∑’Ë ÿ®√‘μ‡¢â“„®‰¥â∂Ÿ°μâÕ߇∑à“π—ÈπÀ“‡æ’¬ßæÕ‰¡à, À“°·μàμâÕß

(ÛÒ)
欓¬“¡√à“ß„À⺟≡à ÿ®√‘μ‰¡à¡’‚Õ°“ ®ß„®‡¢â“„®º‘¥‰¥â¥â«¬®÷ß®–¥’∑’Ë ÿ¥. ≈Õ√奇¥ππ‘Ëß,
´÷Ë߇ªìππ—°°ÆÀ¡“¬ºŸâ∑√߉«â´÷ËßÕ—®©√‘¬¿“æ Ÿß¬‘ËߺŸâÀπ÷ËߢÕßÕ—ß°ƒ…„πªí®®ÿ∫—π, „Àâ·ß৑¥Õ’°

·ßàÀπ÷Ëß«à“, ‘Ëß∑’Ëæ÷ß√–≈÷°‡¡◊ËÕæ‘®“√≥“μ—«∫∑°ÆÀ¡“¬°Á§◊Õ, ‡ªìπ°“√æâπ«‘ —¬¢Õß¡πÿ…¬å

ªÿ∂ÿ™π∑’Ë®–§“¥°“√≥剫â≈à«ßÀπⓉ¥â«à“, ®–¡’°√≥’„¥‡°‘¥„πÕπ“§μ∫â“ß, ·≈–·¡â«à“®–
§“¥°“√≥剥â, °Á‡ªìπ°“√‡À≈◊Õ«‘ —¬∑’Ë®–∫—≠≠—μ‘°ÆÀ¡“¬„Àâ§≈ÿ¡∂÷ß°√≥’‡À≈à“π—Èπ‰¥â∑ÿ°°√≥’

‚¥¬ª√“»®“°§«“¡‡§≈◊Õ∫§≈ÿ¡. ¿“…“Õ—ß°ƒ…¡‘„™à‡§√◊ËÕß¡◊Õ∑’Ë®–„™â‰¥â‡∑’ˬßμ√ß·≈–
(ÛÚ)
·πàπÕπÕ¬à“ß°“√§”π«≥.

(Û)
ùWe ought to make great allowance for the framers of Acts of Parliament in these
days; nothing is so easy as to pull them to pieces, nothing is so difficult as
to construct them properly, as the law now stands.û per Lord St. Leonards in

OûFlaherty V. MûDowell (1857) 6 H.L.C. 142, 179.
(ÛÒ)
ùI have had on many occasions, to draft Acts of Parliament, which, although they
may be easy to understand, people continually try to misunderstand, and in which,
therefore, it is not enough to attain to a degree of precision which a person reading

in good faith can understand, but it is necessary to attain if possible to a degree
of precision which a person reading in bad faith cannot misunderstand. It is all
the better if he cannot pretend to misunderstand it.û per Stephen J. in Re Castioni
(1891) 1 Q.B. 149, 167.
(ÛÚ)
Whenever a statute comes up for consideration it must be remembered that it is
not within human powers to foresee the manifold sets of facts which may arise;
and that, even if it were, it is not possible to provide for them in terms from all
ambiguity. The English language is not an instrument of mathematical precision...û

per Lord Denning in Seaford Court Estates Ltd. V. Asher (1949) 2 K.B. 481 at
p. 498.