Page 32 - WMP_Neat
P. 32

Information from  the Forestry Department
                      Prediction Methodologies                 would provide additional data on the
                                                               expected composition of the tree species.
            Assessment of project impacts on wildlife          Furthermore, examination of forest types,
            includes using technology such as camera           topographic maps, aerial photographs (e.g.
            traps, radio and satellite collars that adapted    unmanned aerial vehicles) and possibly
            in hand computation methods and computer           remote sensing images may be able to
            methods.  These models  have gained  in            provide an overview of the area. A rapid
            popularity in recent years and are widely used     survey would support the identification made
            in almost any scientific field due to their        from the secondary sources.
            accuracy, ease of use, and rapid analysis.
                                                               Quantitative plant assessments and habitat
            Computer     software   (e.g.,  ArcGIS)   can      profiling are needed for impact prediction,
            describe the land use, wildlife distribution,      including identification of plant species, their
            and    wildlife   movement,     consequently       distribution  and    community,    and   their
            measuring the possible impact during               importance (e.g., medicinal plants). Sample
            construction  and operational phases. This         plots (e.g., 100 m x 20 m) or quarter
            allows a  clearer assessment of  impacts and       representative methods are commonly used
            testing mitigation measures. In some cases,        in the floral assessment.
            quantifying  the  impact  is  unnecessary,  while
            the negative impacts that have severe              The altitudinal range, vegetation growth and
            consequences require quantification.               relative abundance of non-woody plants such
                                                               as   herbaceous     flora,  climbers,  palms,
            A pre-requisite to the EMP and WMP for land        bamboos and ferns, and litter layers shall be
            conversion for development is obtaining all        considered.
            information relating to the habitats and
            wildlife in the construction area and its          Identification and flora sampling techniques
            surroundings.    The    floral   and    faunal     can refer to the relevant publications. Several
            composition in the area must be recognised         institutions such as herbaria at Forest
            for impact assessment.                             Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) in
                                                               Kepong, Sarawak Forestry Department in
            The consultants are required to decide level of    Kuching, Forest Research Centre in Sepilok,
            depth    and    time   in   undertaking   the      Sabah and universities would serve as useful
            biodiversity   surveys   within   undisturbed      reference centres for species confirmation.
            forests and those areas that have been logged
            previously.                                             Methodology for Fauna Assessment

            The presence of endemic, unique, rare, and         Habitat survey and profiling would give an
            endangered flora and fauna and medicinal           idea of the possible range of fauna present in
            plants within construction and its surrounding     the proposed area and its surroundings.
            areas should be highlighted.                       Faunal assessment includes identifying the
                                                               common species, rare, endangered, endemic,
            Further    consideration   in   habitat   and      conservational significance, migratory, and
            management plan and understanding the              sensitive species.
            specific requirements  for an area should  be
            carefully planned to develop methodologies         Wildlife is more practical to act as indicators
            most suitable to assess the impacts.               that reflect the land use and development
                                                               change. A detailed wildlife population study
                 Methodology for Flora Assessment              and assisting wildlife authorities in relocating
                                                               certain wildlife species would be crucial
            The type of habitat found in the project area      during land development.
            must be recognised for further floral
            assessment.      The     identification   and      Wildlife can be evaluated using direct
            description of habitat types (e.g., hill or        observation (e.g., sighting of birds, reptiles,
            lowland forest) offer a general indication of      amphibians, and mammals) or indirectly
            the plant species that are expected to occur. A    through animal signs like tracks, sounds and
            useful technique in measuring possible             calls, burrows, dens and nests markings on soil
            adverse impacts of logging areas is surveying      or vegetation, bones or carcass, droppings,
            adjacent areas that have been logged               feathers and others. Another indirect data
            previously.                                        collection is from an interview of inhabitants
                                                               (e.g., Orang Asli) within or adjacent to the
                                                               development area.


            28      GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF WILDLIFE
                    MANAGEMENT PLAN (WMP) IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37