Page 125 - 20818_park-c_efi
P. 125

1) So that the marriage not be a mistaken transaction.  2) So as not to
 violate the prohibition of deception.
 The  Kehillos Yaakov answered him that it says in the  Gemara
 (Yevamos #44) that if someone unknowingly transgresses a negative
 Torah precept by marrying someone (such as if he married a woman   WHEN AND HOW TO
 not knowing that she was a mamzeres) according to Rav Huna, the   82  REVEAL TO PARENTS THAT
 marriage is not a mistaken transaction. However, if one sells a prohib-
 ited item, such as meat that was found to be treifah, or even if one sells   THEY GAVE BIRTH TO A
 something that is only prohibited Rabbinically, the sale is considered   BLIND CHILD?
 a mistaken transaction, as explained by the Rambam and Shulchan
 Aruch (Choshen Mishpat #234). What is the difference between these
 two situations?
 Perhaps the difference is that one who buys meat does not have an
 interest in one specific piece of meat and would not care if he received   1   Questions PaRents Gave BiRth to a Blind Child
 a different piece of meat. Therefore, if he bought meat that turned
 out to be treif, the sale is a mistaken transaction, because he could just   1.  When should an ophthalmologist reveal to the parents the fact
 as well have bought a piece of meat without blemish. Marriages are   that their newborn baby is blind? We are referring to blindness
 different. They are as difficult as the splitting of the Red Sea. When   which was confirmed by electrophysiological testing showing
 two people agree to marry, their joy is enormous. No one marries   that he cannot see because of degeneration of the retina, in spite
 just “anyone.”  People choose a mate who finds favor in their eyes.   of the normal external appearance of his eyes.
 Therefore, a minor defect is not enough to nullify the marriage, only
 a real blemish which is serious enough to warrant a divorce would   2.  How should one reveal this fact to the parents? I should point
 disqualify a marriage. Therefore, there is no issue of a mistaken trans-  out that the parents have another blind girl and a retarded girl,
 action here.    and they put all their hopes in this child, whom they assume is
 Regarding the issue of deception, it would seem that one need not   able to see.
 inform a potential mate of this issue. Proof for this assertion is in
 Tractate Yevamos (45a) where the son of a gentile father is advised   3.  I would also like to clarify the halacha for degeneration of the
 to travel abroad, where his origins are unknown, in order to find a   retina that causes blindness. In general, people born with this
 mate. He is not obligated to reveal his origins to the girl before his   disease become blind in their teens or twenties, after a long pro-
 marriage. The reason for this is because of a blemish is not enough   cess of deterioration. How and when should the patient or the
 to cause someone to back out of a deal once it was done, then one is   family be informed about the inevitable blindness?
 not obligated to reveal it. We can logically assess that once they have
 formed an emotional bond, and divorce would be difficult, and who   Dr. P. A. Avraham
 knows if another match would come up, then bedieved they would   Central Institute of Ophthalmology,
 accept the blemish. Therefore, hiding this blemish before marriage is   Central Public Hospital, Tel Hashomer




 86   1  Medical-HalacHic Responsa of Rav ZilbeRstein  Parents Gave Birth to a Blind Child  2   111







































































                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          # 20818_efi-ab - 20818_park-C_efi-ab | 4 - A | 18-08-20 | 13:46:23



  4
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130