Page 77 - Internal Auditing Standards
P. 77

Guide to Using International Standards on Auditing in the Audits of Small- and Medium-Sized Entities Volume 1—Core Concepts





        Pervasive controls form the basis from which specific transactional controls are built.  They set the “tone at
        the top” and establish expectations for the organization’s control environment in general. Poorly designed
        pervasive controls may actually encourage all types of error and fraud to take place. For example, an entity

        may have a highly controlled and effective sales process. However, if senior management has a poor attitude
        toward control and has sometimes overridden these controls, a material error could still occur in the fi nancial
        statements. Management override and poor “tone at the top” are common themes in corporate wrongdoing.

        Pervasive controls also include the monitoring controls that assess whether the actual tone at the top is what
        was intended, and how well control expectations are being fulfi lled.

        The pervasive controls (sometimes called entity level controls) could include:
        •     Controls related to the control environment;

        •     Controls over management override;
        •     The entity’s risk assessment process;

        •     Controls to monitor results of operations and other controls;

        •     Controls over the period-end financial reporting process; and


        •     Policies that address significant business control and risk management practices.
        Smaller Entities
        In smaller entities, the lack of specific business process controls (due to limited staff and resources) is often



        offset by a high degree of involvement by management (such as the owner-manager) in performing controls.
        In fact, some pervasive controls in smaller entities can often operate at a level of precision that actually serves

        to prevent or detect specific misstatements. However, the increased involvement of senior management also
        increases the risk of management override. This could be addressed through further audit procedures or the
        design of suitable anti-fraud controls. (See Volume 1, Chapter 5.12 below.)


        Pervasive Control Defi ciencies

        Although weaknesses in pervasive controls do not generally result in an immediate deficiency or errors in

        the financial statements, they still have a signifi cant influence on the likelihood of misstatements resulting at

        the business process control level. The absence of good pervasive controls may seriously undermine other

        business process controls; consequently, signifi cant deficiencies in these controls would be reported to
        management and those charged with governance.
        5.12 Anti-Fraud Controls


        In the last few years, a new type of internal control has begun to emerge, sometimes called anti-fraud
        controls. Since the vast majority of sizable frauds tend to involve senior management, the establishment of
        strong anti-fraud programs and controls is considered a healthy part of the control environment in larger
        entities. Anti-fraud controls can be likened to speed bumps on a road that are designed to slow down traffi  c
        but not stop it altogether. Anti-fraud controls are designed to deter bad behavior before it happens, but can
        never stop it entirely.

        Anti-fraud controls are particularly relevant for larger entities, but can also be designed to discourage fraud
        in smaller entities. They may not prevent frauds from occurring, but they do provide a powerful disincentive.
        They cause the perpetrators to think carefully about the repercussions of their actions.




                                                                                                                   75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82