Page 229 - Chayei Adam LAYOUT sivan 5782

םדא הכוס יניד “ ו - מק ללכ ייח

ּ
ד ַע חַפ ֶּט ַה ן ִמ הֶנ ָּק ַחיִנ ַמּו ,חַפ ֶט ֹותֹוא דֶגֶנכ ְּּ 13 יִנ ֵ ּ ׁש ַה ַעֹוצ ְּק ִּמ ַה ףֹוס דֶגֶנכ ְּּ 12 הֶנ ָּק די ִמֲעַי
, ׁ ש ָּּמ ַמ ן ָּדְּגֶנ ְּכ הֶי ְּהִּי ֶ ׁש ק ַר ן ֶהָּּב ַעֵגֹונ ֹוני ֵא ֶ ׁש ן ֶה ֵמ הָּל ְּע ַמְּל ּו ּ ל ִפֲא ֹוא ֹו ּדְּגֶנ ְּכ ֶ ׁש הֶנ ָּּ ק ַה
ּ
ּ
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ּ
חָּּנ ֻמ ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ם ִא ּו ּ ל ִפאו ֲ ַ 1 4 .תֹוּצ ִח ְּמ ןי ִד ְּב תָּּב ַ ׁש 'להב ר ָּאֹב ְּמַּכ ח ַתֶּפ ַה ת ַרּוצ יֵוֲה ַד
ְּ

ֹ
ּ
ם ֵ ׁשְּל ה ֶשֲעַנ אל ךָּכ ְּּס ַה ְּד ,ן ֶהיֵּבַּג לַע הֶנ ָּק ַחיִנ ַהְּלּו רי ִמ ְּח ַהְּל יּוא ָּר םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמ ,ן ֶהיֵלֲע
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ַחּותָּ ּפ ַה ןֹו ּ ל ַח ך ֶר ֶד תִיַּב ַה ן ִמ אי ִצֹוהְּלּו ֹוכֹות ְּב ל ֵטְּל ַטְּל ר ָּּת ֻמ זאו ָּ ְּ 11 .ח ַתֶּפ ַה ת ַרּוצ
ּ
ְּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ןֵּכ ם ִא אָּּ ל ֶא ל ֵטְּל ַטְּל רּוס ָּא תֹותָּּב ַ ׁש ר ָּא ְּ ׁש ִב ְּד בַּג לַע ף ַא ְּד ,ג ָּח ֶה ךֹות ְּב ֶ ׁש תָּּב ַ ׁש ְּב הָּּכ ֻּסַל
ְּ
ֹ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ּ
ןֶפּד יֵוֲה ַד ֹוּג ִמ ןַני ִר ְּמ ָּא ג ָּח ֶה ךֹות ְּב ֶ ׁש תָּּב ַ ׁש ְּב םֹוק ָּמ לָּּכ ִמ ,תי ִעי ִב ְּר ַחּור ְּב ןּו ּ ק ִת ׁשֵי
ּ
םדו רשב
understands that the purpose of the tzuras s’chach is suspended above the poles, it might
ha’pesach is to extend the succah and not be disqualified for the same reason. If,
create a wall. As such, unless the third wall is however, the walls reach the s’chach there is
complete, it is only valid to the point the no concern (Haga’os Maimonis, Darkei Moshe)
tzuras ha’pesach extends it. The Chazon Ish and the Rema therefore rules that there is no
concurs with this approach. need for an additional horizontal beam if the
walls reach the s’chach. However, the Talmud
14. A tzuras ha’pesach is valid as long as Yerushalmi distinguishes between a tzuras
the lintel (horizontal beam) passes over the ha’pesach where the lintel was placed there to
top of the two doorposts (vertical beams) even form a tzuras ha’pesach, and s'chach, which
if it is suspended high above. In actuality, this wasn’t placed there for this purpose.
principle is applied in the construction of most Accordingly, it would seem that even if the
city eruvin. See Shulchan Aruch O.C. 362:11 walls reach the s’chach, an additional beam is
and Chayei Adam 48:6. required. The Pri Megadim however explains
that this distinction is only true if the walls
15. Theoretically, the s'chach itself should don’t reach the s’chach. The Elya Rabba offers
serve as the lintel of this ‘doorway’ since it is that since the s’chach is placed on it in order
positioned above the succah’s walls. This to build a kosher succah, it is also considered
should be true, even if the poles don’t reach as being put there for the purpose of creating
the height of the s'chach, which is in fact the a tzuras ha’pesach See also Biur HaGra who
טי
ruling of the Rambam. However, the gemara explains that the Talmud Bavli (who we adhere
(Eruvin 11a) teaches that one of the reasons to) argues with the Yerushalmi. Furthermore,
why ‘pischei shimai’ (damaged entrances) are the tzuras ha’pesach is only required here as a
not valid to serve as a tzuras ha’pesach is stringency and is not like other cases in
because it lacks a roof. Accordingly, if the halacha where the tzuras ha’pesach is meant

229